On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:13:47 -0400 Corwin Brust wrote ---
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:31 AM Matt m...@excalamus.com> wrote:
> >
> > FSF associate members have access to a FSF hosted Jitsi instance. I'm an
> > FSF associate member and could host it using that if I'm able to make the
Thanks for confirming the issue.
For the record, after doing some more research it looks like at least one other
person came across this issue, and the workaround was using org-edna in place
of the repeaters, which will push the timestamps together to the same date
offset prior to the scheduled
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I would like to assess the efficiency of one of search optimizations used
> in org-element.el [1]
Thanks everyone for responding!
It looks like the optimization is useful at least to some people (20%
cached searches is a good thing to have).
A number of people also rep
✋ Interested as well
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 07:43 Dave Marquardt wrote:
> Russell Adams writes:
>
> > Would there be any interest in a monthly 1-2 hour long ad-hoc screen
> > sharing and video discussion for Org-mode?
>
> I'm interested.
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Do I understand correctly that your package is adding the following new
> features:
>
> 1. Automatically manages balanced
>`org-babel-tangle'/`org-babel-detangle' in Org sources and target
>buffers.
> 2. Attempts to make more fine-grained tangling/detanging functi
Russell Adams writes:
> Would there be any interest in a monthly 1-2 hour long ad-hoc screen
> sharing and video discussion for Org-mode?
I'm interested.
-Dave
Mehmet Tekman writes:
> I would like to contribute some a new library into org-mode, which
> performs automatic synchronization between tangled files and their
> org-mode source blocks via a global minor mode
> `org-babel-tangle-sync-mode' which uses the after-save-hook.
Thanks for your interest
"J. G." writes:
> * TODO My late recurring todoSCHEDULED: <2023-04-12 Wed ++1w> DEADLINE:
> <2023-04-13 Thu ++1w>
> Right now it is Wednesday (2023-04-26 to be precise), and as shown above, my
> task had a scheduled timestamp on a Wednesday from a previous week. The
> repeater is ++1w, so mark
