You can find the information about it (e.g.) here:
https://orgmode.org/manual/The-date_002ftime-prompt.html
If you are prompted for the date, you can give a point ('.') and
the current date is shown.
I think this is "short enough".
Hello.
The manual says that
"When point is at an existing timestamp in the buffer, ['C-c .'
(‘org-time-stamp’)] is used to modify this timestamp instead of
inserting a new one."
but the default value is the existing date, not the current one so it
is not convenient at all for me.
In fact, I
Hi Bruce,
The "official" repo will be at https://github.com/org-noter/org-noter, but
I need to work out some snafus/teething issues.
Peter
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 4:37 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> This is really cool, but doesn't there really need to be a single repo for
> distribution, issue rep
Matt writes:
> Hi Jack and Jeremie! I'm curious your thoughts about what Ihor and I are
> discussing at the end of this message about `md5'.
Thanks for checking in. I don't see any problems with switching to
org-id-uuid or similar.
Feel free to update ob-python to do this, or I can also do it
Hi All,
After months of work, Karthink and I have prepared a rather large patch-set
completely overhauling the LaTeX preview system. I hope to have a patch set
shortly, but in the mean time it would be good to get some more people testing
this.
To test this feature, please check out the `dev' bra
Hi
When enabled org-table-header-line-mode, the LaTeX symbols in the header
are not fontified.
I found it, because I was trying the package "Org Table Sticky Header",
that seems to make the same work, but with this external package there
is not that problem.
Best regards
This is really cool, but doesn't there really need to be a single repo for
distribution, issue reporting, etc.?
Do you have a plan for which fork would become primary?
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023, 11:35 PM Peter Mao wrote:
> Dear Org maintainers:
>
> I don't think org-noter is part of any official or
Zelphir Kaltstahl writes:
>> Now, the main question is whether it is safe to use `define' in all the
>> scheme implementations. If it is, would you be interested in turning
>> your personal fix into a patch for ob-scheme?
>
> Sure! Would need to familiarize myself with with process of doing that,
lux writes:
> Ok, I'll undo this part of the changes first, and repost patch.
> From b48784a16c5806694498f072ffdd98e5a3c144b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xi Lu
> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 18:53:37 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/ob-latex.el: Fix command injection vulnerability
Thanks!
Applied
10 matches
Mail list logo
