Hi,
The following MWE
* Test repeating task
** My tasks
*** TODO Test task
SCHEDULED: <2021-08-18 Wed +1w>
works fine:
* Test repeating task
** My tasks
*** TODO Test task
SCHEDULED: <2021-08-25 Wed +1w>
:PROPERTIES:
:LAST_REPEAT: [2021-08-18 Wed 07:50]
:END:
- Stat
Den ons 18 aug. 2021 kl 02:17 skrev Tim Cross :
>
> Milan Zamazal writes:
>
> Actually, that one has been on my todo list to cehck out for a while.
> Might be time to bump the priority a bit!
>
> I just started using it and it works really well so far!
Den tis 17 aug. 2021 kl 08:54 skrev Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <
arne_...@web.de>:
>
> Tim Cross writes:
>
> > Emacs' support for asynchronous operations is at best primitive. There
> > is built-in support for calling processes asynchonously and
> > there is some other development work to set the
Milan Zamazal writes:
>> "TC" == Tim Cross writes:
>
> TC> Personally, I took a different route. I keep the number of files
> TC> which contribute to my agenda to a minimum and have an easy way
> TC> to update/change that list. I can quickly switch agenda contexts
> TC> dep
* lisp/ox-ascii.el (org-ascii--justify-lines): Ensure that
`indent-tabs-mode' is nil when applying indentation to justify lines.
This prevents tab characters from appearing in the export when
`indent-tabs-mode' still has its default value of t. TINYCHANGE
---
Hi,
I've attached a patch to fix an i
Hello,
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> Notice that you can get vertical representation of results as a list
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results list
>
> The following is a variation of a recipe suggested by Juan Manuel:
>
> #+name: to-column
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var lst=()
>(mapcar #'list lst)
> #
> "TC" == Tim Cross writes:
TC> Personally, I took a different route. I keep the number of files
TC> which contribute to my agenda to a minimum and have an easy way
TC> to update/change that list. I can quickly switch agenda contexts
TC> depending on what I'm doing.
It’s alw
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Tim Cross writes:
>
>> Emacs' support for asynchronous operations is at best primitive. There
>> is built-in support for calling processes asynchonously and
>> there is some other development work to set the stage for addi
Tim,
thanks.
> It isn't so much that nothing is possible but rather nobody has
> implemented a consistent model which can be adopted and has been
> implemented by all backends. This is why I consider this to be a
> feature request and not a bug report. This is not expected/defined
> behaviour whi