yes, in recent maint. thanks for testing.
On 7/9/21, Mark Barton wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 9, 2021, at 6:12 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
>>
>> this might be a bad bug report. it seems intermittent.
>>
>> recent maint.
>>
>> create headers each with a link on it. mark all. org-ctrl-c-minus.
>>
>> this
> On Jul 9, 2021, at 6:12 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
> this might be a bad bug report. it seems intermittent.
>
> recent maint.
>
> create headers each with a link on it. mark all. org-ctrl-c-minus.
>
> this has incorrectly put - as part of the link descriptions.
>
> --
> The Kafka Pand
Axel Svensson writes:
> org-version: 9.4.6
>
> The documentation for the variable org-startup-folded is not up to date. It
> states that the variable can be nil or non-nil, but the program logic makes
> a difference between the values 't, 'content, 'showeverything,
> 'show2levels, 'show3levels, '
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> As a possible fix I'm attaching this patch.
> + (add-face-text-property start visible-start face-property)
> + (add-face-text-property visible-start visible-end face-property)
> + (add-face-text-property visible-end end face-proper
this might be a bad bug report. it seems intermittent.
recent maint.
create headers each with a link on it. mark all. org-ctrl-c-minus.
this has incorrectly put - as part of the link descriptions.
--
The Kafka Pandemic
Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 22:28, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello,
> ** Greg Minshall [2021-07-07 09:56:06 +0300]:
>
> > Vladimir,
>
> >> I couldn't find in Org manual how tangling should work if there are
> >> several source code blocks with the same file name for ':tangle'. The
> >> Org manual sectio
Tim,
> On Jul 8, 2021, at 12:32 PM, Tim Cross wrote:
>
> My concern here is with the additional complexity. This is already a
> somewhat complex aspect of org mode and the behaviour you describe can
> effectively be done using noweb, although as you say, not as
> declarative in style.
This (an
Colin Baxter writes:
>> Tim Cross writes:
>
We could introduce multiple possibilities to choose from.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Ask in case of an empty directory if it should be deleted.
> >>> 2. Don't ask. Don't touch an empty directory. (The state now.)
> >>> 3. Don't ask. Del
Tim wrote:
> This could just be me, but recently, I'm becoming very concerned
> about the growth of additional features and options in org mode.
Count me in. I have been mostly been hanging around in the shadows, but this is
serious enough for me to wave a flag on the right side.
I would go as f
Timothy writes:
> Pushed :) For future reference, should I be less wary of pushing commits
> I'm confident in and haven't had any negative feedback on?
Yes, sure.
> p.s. updates.orgmode.org is returning a 502 error again
Fixed, thanks.
PS: I'm off next week but will be more available from 20-
Bastien writes:
> You can consider this an explicit approval :) Even if we do something
> wrong, we can always discuss and revert it.
>
> Thanks!
Pushed :) For future reference, should I be less wary of pushing commits
I'm confident in and haven't had any negative feedback on?
--
Timothy
p.
On Friday, 9 Jul 2021 at 09:36, William Denton wrote:
> Is the citation work big enough to move the version number for the
> next full release to 10?
I guess it doesn't break anything (i.e. fully backwards compatible) so
no real need to bump the version number?
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.
org-version: 9.4.6
The documentation for the variable org-startup-folded is not up to date. It
states that the variable can be nil or non-nil, but the program logic makes
a difference between the values 't, 'content, 'showeverything,
'show2levels, 'show3levels, 'show4levels, and 'show5levels.
Hi Timothy,
Timothy writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> I let Timothy decide.
>
> I consider this patch fit to merge. I'm just under the impression that
> this I should only push files I'm listed as a maintainer for without
> explicit approval.
You can consider this an explicit approval :) Even if
Bastien writes:
> I let Timothy decide.
I consider this patch fit to merge. I'm just under the impression that
this I should only push files I'm listed as a maintainer for without
explicit approval.
--
Timothy
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> Can we merge this patch now?
I let Timothy decide.
--
Bastien
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> Loris Bennett writes:
>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>>>
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I want to export an org file to a pdf and have the pdf created in
> subdirectory relative to the org fil
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, July 9th, 2021 at 8:26 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ** Greg Minshall minsh...@umich.edu [2021-07-07 09:56:06 +0300]:
>
> > Vladimir,
>
> > > I couldn't find in Org manual how tangling should work if there are
> > >
> > > several source cod
On 09/07/2021 02:32, Tim Cross wrote:
Marko Schuetz-Schmuck writes:
I would find it useful to have a more declarative way for specifying
sequence. I imagine e.g. using "#+REQUIRES:" and "#+PROVIDES:" to
capture dependency and then have the exporter compute a sequence
satisfying these. I would t
Is the citation work big enough to move the version number for the next full
release to 10?
Bill
--
William Denton
https://www.miskatonic.org/
Librarian, artist and licensed private investigator.
Can we merge this patch now?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:14 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> Looks good, Bastien, and I think reflects the consensus of that thread.
>
> But trying just now, I'm not able to apply the patch on my local repo
> for whatever reason, so haven't tested it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun
Congratulations What time is the parade?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 8:03 AM Julian M. Burgos
wrote:
> Amazing! Thank you to everyone that contributed. I am looking forward to
> start playing with this. :)
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > It took years, but citations are now ful
Hello,
** Greg Minshall [2021-07-07 09:56:06 +0300]:
> Vladimir,
>> I couldn't find in Org manual how tangling should work if there are
>> several source code blocks with the same file name for ':tangle'. The
>> Org manual section "15.8 Extracting Source Code" is a bit
>> obscure. There are thes
Amazing! Thank you to everyone that contributed. I am looking forward to
start playing with this. :)
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> It took years, but citations are now full part of Org syntax.
>
> Thanks to everyone involved over the time!
>
> Now, it needs to be documented, but that wi
Nicolas,
> It took years, but citations are now full part of Org syntax.
as others are saying and thinking, thank you all very much. being an
ignorant observer of this process, i was (not surprised, but, still) in
amazement at all the expertise and technical work so many put in to
developing and
Wow, congratulations!
Yours,
Christian
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> It took years, but citations are now full part of Org syntax.
>
> Thanks to everyone involved over the time!
>
> Now, it needs to be documented, but that will come a bit later.
>
> Regards,
Amazing news, thank you very much Nicolas and to everybody else who contributed!
András
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 11:47, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> Thanks for all your work on this Nicolas: really nice job!
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 2:54 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It took years, but
Thanks for all your work on this Nicolas: really nice job!
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 2:54 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It took years, but citations are now full part of Org syntax.
>
> Thanks to everyone involved over the time!
>
> Now, it needs to be documented, but that will come a bit la
Hi,
To reproduce the bug:
1. Put some link: [[target][description]]
2. Run `org-toggle-link-display'
As a possible fix I'm attaching this patch.
Best regards,
Juan Manuel
>From caf32a7e1fb1b4bddfa011520f5403d5b6b19ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juan Manuel Macias
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 0
I've noticed that "org-bibtex-import-from-file" will not import from bib files
which begin with the standard bibtex mode-line heading of
@Comment -*- mode: bibtex; -*-
Bib files with any @Comment line are similarly rejected.
This is rather unfortunate.
Hi Tim,
> This is all beginning to feel like we are running very close to the
> tipping point at which time we will have something that is so complex
> that only a very few people are able to maintain the code base and keep
> the system stable. New maintainers are discouraged because of the code
>
On Friday, 9 Jul 2021 at 15:58, Timothy wrote:
> This could be as simple as a way of handling links to named
> images/tables/etc. when exporting.
Maybe start a new thread, with a clear indication of what is missing in
the current version with respect to referencing. I use internal
references all
Hi Nicolas,
In light of all the thoughts expressed on referencing, I no longer think it's a
good idea to have referencing capabilities in wip-cite-new.
I think referencing should get a bit of attention, as citation has here, but a
much smaller separate effort now appears more appropriate to me.
Hi Bhavin,
On 7/8/21 8:19 PM, Bhavin Gandhi wrote:
Hello Alan,
Thank you for sharing a detailed description.
[...]
I think this is same issue as reported in this bug report:
https://orgmode.org/list/87o8c8xp9b@gmail.com/
Thank you for the pointer to this -- clearly I missed it in my initi
Marko Schuetz-Schmuck writes:
> I would find it useful to have a more declarative way for specifying
> sequence. I imagine e.g. using "#+REQUIRES:" and "#+PROVIDES:" to
> capture dependency and then have the exporter compute a sequence
> satisfying these.
I would say that declaring an explicit o
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> It took years, but citations are now full part of Org syntax.
>
> Thanks to everyone involved over the time!
>
> Now, it needs to be documented, but that will come a bit later.
>
Well done Nicolas and all those who assisted. Definitely a non-trivial
additio
36 matches
Mail list logo
