Kévin Le Gouguec writes:
> Since the changes in Org 9.4 aimed at improving performance, is there a
> test case somewhere in the "Mitigating the poor Emacs performance on
> huge org files" thread that could help ensure that a tentative fix will
> not degrade performance?
The first message in the
Hi,
I introduced the change that broke the behavior. The attached patch
seems to fix the issue for me, does it look reasonable?
Thanks,
thibault
On 2020-12-09T13:16:19-0500, Jeremie Juste wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for reporting. Indeed this is an issue that hasn't been fixed
yet. This is t
i just wanted to say thanks to everybody who maintains org.
somebody said a counter for donations might be useful even if nobody
collects it. i am not able to follow this discussion closely for
health reasons, but one possibility, which you can reject if you like,
but which i mention because nobo
Consider an Org mode file with a table.el table (which I made by
first constructing an Org mode table and then usind `C-c ~' to convert it):
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* table.el table
++++
| a | b | c |
++++
| 1 | 2
I actually hadn't used the archive command in quite a while, so not sure
when the behavior in my situation changed. It does make sense though that
it might have something to do with the file being stored in a dropbox
folder.
Anyway,
(setq org-archive-subtree-save-file-p nil)
in the init file fix
I don't think this should be forgotten about, so I'm adding it to
https://updates.orgmode.org/#help for now.
(Sorry, due to a mistake, the text of my message did not appear in my previous
email)
Hi,
I would like to propose this patch to add some LaTeX attributes to the verse
block,
especially to be able to apply certain features from the verse.sty package,
which is an
extension (widely used in Humani
Eric,
> Sure, and I do use it this way, but I had the impression that it was the
> non-git aspects that were being put forward as being somehow helpful. I
> could be wrong.
i'm not a git-spert. but, the "pull requests" mechanism and "issues"
(but reports), are maybe bits of git*.com that people
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> You will probably need to implement this from scratch (or use the
> feature/org-fold branch from github.com/yantar92/org).
Gotcha. TBH I don't know if I'll have the time to cook up a patch
before 27.2 is released; all the same, I appreciate you taking the time
to explai
On Wednesday, 16 Dec 2020 at 16:13, Loris Bennett wrote:
> But even if a project is hosted on GitHub, you can still interact with
> it just via Emacs, it is still Git after all.
Sure, and I do use it this way, but I had the impression that it was the
non-git aspects that were being put forward as
10 matches
Mail list logo
