Hello,
Samuel Wales writes:
> more than one clock can be useful, but maybe need not be org-related,
> even if that would be nice? for example, your laundry is due in 45m,
> tea will be steeped in 8m, etc.
for that exactly that use case ;) I have a small shell script that
creates at jobs and pop
* ox-publish.el (org-publish-sitemap): Include files that have an
ancestor below base-directory with no published files and sitemap style
is tree.
This entire patch is released to the public domain by its author,
Anthony Carrico. TINYCHANGE
---
lisp/ox-publish.el | 21 +++--
Hello everyone,
I looked into using text properties to hide all the stars in org headings
(with org-starless-mode [1]),
and noticed that `org-cycle' didn't reliably cycle the visibility of
headings anymore.
Trying to find the reason for this, I found that `org-cycle' uses
`move-beginning-of-line'
On Thursday, 10 Sep 2020 at 20:17, Sébastien Miquel wrote:
> It isn't applied
> - to src blocks, when the language isn't recognized
> - to special blocks (that is, blocks with arbitrary names)
>
> I make heavy use of special blocks and I'd like this face to apply to them.
I also make heavy use o
Hello Sharon,
I must have failed to grasp the subtleties of your workflow. And my
explanation was surely not very friendly. I apologize for that.
If your workflow works for you this is what matters.
> Sorry, but I just feel that your system is over-complicated as compared
> to my simplistic way!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jeremie Juste writes:
> Hello Sharon,
Hi Jeremie.
> Unfortunately I cannot reproduce your issue. I created a list of 56 sub
> heading and I
> can view the heading Still a sample 0 until Still a sample 56.
>
>
> ** TODO * etc and onwards
> ** T
> However, I just (strongly) prefer the shorter "ISO-like" ID for many
> reasons, as already mentioned (shorter, meaningful, etc.). I just find
> that style much, much more elegant.
I guess it does not take much to add this functionality.
Patch attached.
Best,
Ihor
>From 6f2fff0cb7ce294d863ee0
Hey,
I don't think anyone here will fall for this, but... just to
make sure: the referenced mail was spam, and possibly a phishing
attempt.
Be careful, folks :-)
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
