On 2020-07-07, at 13:26, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a way to retroactively mark a task as having been done
> at a previous time/date. I know that I can just change the keyword to
org-todo-yesterday?
Hth,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
Adam Spiers writes:
> I'm looking for a way to retroactively mark a task as having been done
> at a previous time/date. I know that I can just change the keyword to
> DONE and then edit the timestamp, but this is tedious when it's a
> repeating event, e.g.:
[...]
I'm not aware of any built-in su
nilninull writes:
> The Emacs customization system is unable to display some parameter types
> for the variable `org-agenda-category-icon-alist'.
>
> I encountered this bug when I specified :width and :height.
>
> :width and :height use integers, but the symbol type doesn't parse it well.
>
>
> di
Philip Blagoveschensky writes:
> (defcustom org-attach-use-inheritance 'selective
[...]
> As you can see, it can be either nil, t, or selective. However due to the
>
>:type 'boolean)
>
> line, it's impossible to set it to selective using customize-variable.
Thanks for reporting. Fixed in e62
Nick Dokos writes:
> Here's the amended patch: it includes the fixes from Kyle's review, the
> modification
> he suggested that adds the plain property for each _ALL property to the list
> and a few test cases to the test/org-buffer-property-keys test.
Thank you for the updates. Applied (bc4fa8
stardiviner writes:
> After recently (about weeks) update in Org Mode "master" branch. I found [M-q]
> org-fill-paragraph command not apply on the last paragraph of region select
> large part of text. I don't have this problem before.
>
> And I confirmed this problem with minimal Emacs config w
Hello,
I can execute code blocks in different (separate?) files like this:
#+call: ../lob.org:convert-time-range-to-days(range="<2020-02-19
Wed>--<2020-02-21 Fri>")
That is great. Can I call the same function from a table function?
org-sbe doesn't support the above notation extended with an Org
This is the definition of org-attach-use-inheritance:
(defcustom org-attach-use-inheritance 'selective
"Attachment inheritance for the outline.
Enabling inheritance for org-attach implies two things. First,
that attachment links will look through all parent headings until
it finds the linked
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
Here's the amended patch: it includes the fixes from Kyle's review, the
modification
he suggested that adds the plain property for each _ALL property to the list
and a few test cases to the test/org-buffer-property-keys test.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
>From
Hello Adam, All,
Adam Spiers writes:
> [...]
>> His mail is from 2008 and a lot has happened in the mean time. I would
>> suggest that today (1) and (2) can be handled with normal org export or
>> even pandoc. Inline tasks[2] help a lot to add, well inline tasks. For (3)
>> and (4) he mentions a
Thank you for your hard work on this. It's definitely easier to compare two
concrete blocks of code rather than abstract ideas.
> I agree with you that my solution is somewhat intrusive. Ideally, I would
> > have preferred that my solution could leverage advice functions or some
> Org
> > hook, so
Russell Adams writes:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:59:18PM -0700, Rob Duncan wrote:
>> Rob Duncan writes:
>>
>> > Is there a way to specify the display format used for complex number
>> > calculations in the table spreadsheet? In particular I'd like to be
>> > able control whether a value is di
Kyle Meyer writes:
> ,,,
> I think this patch is a clear improvement as is, but in the context of
> completion (and the stack exchange post you link to), isn't the handling
> around *_ALL keywords still a bit off? It seems a caller would want to
> complete without the _ALL; to use the example fr
Hi Kyle,
thanks for the review.
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> Here's a patch to enhance the property name completion list with names from
>> #+PROPERTY keyword lines: at the moment, only property names found in
>> property
>> drawers are used to populate the completion list.
>
>
So, the overall plan that I suggest is as follows:
- Merge the patch(es) I sent. Whether to merge documntation patch or
not, is left for you to decide. The text does not lie to users but it
hints at a feature that is not available yet. These patches will not
break anything for anyone unle
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 14:04, Christian Egli wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'd like to revisit a very old thread[1] where Adam Spiers asks if there
> is support in Org mode for
>
> 1. Allow *fast* production of meeting agendas and minutes, exportable in
>a good-looking legible format which non-org reade
I was able to reproduce the error. I started emacs without my init file
(emacs -q) and then
,
| (add-to-list 'load-path "~/code/elisp/org-mode/lisp")
| (require 'ob-python)
| (org-babel-do-load-languages 'org-babel-load-languages `((python . t)))
`
in scratch, and then ran your test. I go
Hi all,
I've noticed that adding the :STYLE: habit property to a TODO causes
its position in the agenda view to change; it jumps to the bottom of
the day. Is there any way to prevent that?
Thanks!
Adam
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to retroactively mark a task as having been done
at a previous time/date. I know that I can just change the keyword to
DONE and then edit the timestamp, but this is tedious when it's a
repeating event, e.g.:
*** NEXT [#A] meditate 15 minutes every day
SCHEDUL
Hello,
stardiviner writes:
> And here is the steps I reproduce this bug:
>
> 1. Open an Org file which contains long un-wrapped text. Like this:
>
>#+begin_src org
>In addition to debugging a program, VS Code supports running the program.
> The *Debug: Run (Start Without Debugging)* /ac
Kyle Meyer writes:
>> Up to now I thought only a 'format-patch' can be applied easily. Would
>> you please share a way to apply an inline patch? Or at least give a hint?
>
> Sure. For an inline patch, you feed the entire message, rather than the
> attachment, to 'git am'. It looks like Gnus is
22 matches
Mail list logo