Hi all
Some opinions and very old history about exactly the same issue:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-03/msg00766.html
| | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri |
|---+---+---+---+---+---|
| 8:15 | Math
Ciao Gregor,
>> What do you think about this? Is this worth to merge into org mode?
>
> This is nice, I played with it and see it's merit, but I think
> this should not be enabled by default.
>
> Even if the user had to enable it first via customization, this
> version of the code has another dra
On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 17:26, Daryl Manning wrote:
> The DEADLINE with an intermediary step would be cool. The only thing I
> could think of that might make something like that work is if you might
> create a "subtask" that had the DEADLINE and then follow that and resolve
> before the actual to
On Sun, 12 May 2019 at 22:39, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Just to clarify: my intention was to advertise etc/ORG-NEWS more
> widely and point out that it's probably the best place to learn about
> things that are likely to break one's workflows (and if you read it
> before you update, you just might avo
Thanks! That's quite kind. Just glad to know someone found it useful.
The DEADLINE with an intermediary step would be cool. The only thing I
could think of that might make something like that work is if you might
create a "subtask" that had the DEADLINE and then follow that and resolve
before the
