I was looking at https://github.com/joostkremers/criticmarkup-emacs again
recently and ran into something I don't recall happening before.
There is a markup for inserting text thatlooks like {++Insert this text++}.
However, in org-mode this is marked up as strikethrough. Is there a way to
make tha
Hello,
Gustav Wikström writes:
> Yeah - I liked "attached" because I prefer clear keywords. But sure,
> we can keep it shorter. I'd suggest "@" instead in that case. Patch
> updated with that.
"@" syntax is a reserved syntax for citations in the "wip-cite" branch.
I'd rather not use it here. Al
Hello,
"L.C. Karssen" writes:
> I saw you changed a couple of things in the ODT exporter code recently.
> I installed version (9.1.14-9-g131531-elpa today to see if those
> commits
This is not git HEAD, only the latest stable release. Could you try
development version instead?
Regards,
--
Ni
Dear Nicolas,
I saw you changed a couple of things in the ODT exporter code recently.
I installed version (9.1.14-9-g131531-elpa today to see if those commits
fixed the issue(s) discussed in this thread. However, exporting to ODT
with a quoted template file name (#+ODT_STYLES_FILE) still doesn't w
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> That did the trick. Though I'm wondering why the #+name: would cause such
> craziness. . . Also, would anyone know why
>
> #+begin_src lisp :results output :exports both
> (dotimes (x 20)
> (dotimes (y 20)
> (format t "~3d " (* (1+ x) (1+ y
> (f
On Monday, 19 Nov 2018 at 09:02, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> That did the trick.
Great!
> Though I'm wondering why the #+name: would cause such craziness.
Probably because org tries to place the result of the src block after
the associated results line if it is a named src block. With no name,
That did the trick. Though I'm wondering why the #+name: would cause such
craziness. . . Also, would anyone know why
#+begin_src lisp :results output :exports both
(dotimes (x 20)
(dotimes (y 20)
(format t "~3d " (* (1+ x) (1+ y
(format t "~%"))
#+end_src
produces
#+RESULTS:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 4:54 PM David Masterson
wrote:
> What options do I have for doing this in OrgMode??
>
Your best option is to find a website platform that has all the features
that you want. For example
Hugo or Jekyll or WordPress or you name it there are plenty of options.Then
figure out
On Sunday, 18 Nov 2018 at 23:55, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> Try this at home:
[...]
> Am I missing something?
I don't have lisp installed (or at least Emacs doesn't know which lisp
to use) so I cannot try what you have actually written. However, why do
you have #+name: lines with no actual name
(replying to the list)
Hi David,
I would suggest looking into Hugo (https://gohugo.io/). With ox-hugo (
https://ox-hugo.scripter.co/), you can easily export a whole website which
is kept in org-mode format. As for the dynamic stuff:
- Hugo allows very complex data-driven operations. You can, for
10 matches
Mail list logo
