Hello,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM Van L wrote:
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Table alignment assumes you are using a fixed-width font, which
> > may or may not be possible with chinese characters.
>
> there is no monospaced font for combining parts of Unicode?
>
You can try https://github.com/tumashu
On 2018-07-14 at 15:39 -04, Grant Rettke wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
> wrote:
>> Ken Mankoff writes:
>> > Is there a way to get more of the Org file embedded in the tangled
>> > code?
>
> What did you want to add to it?
Good question. I guess I expected everythi
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Ken Mankoff writes:
> > Is there a way to get more of the Org file embedded in the tangled
> > code?
> I don't think so.
What did you want to add to it?
Yes, I tried the development version in that website. I believe
org-plus-contrib can be the issue. It is not working properly. It is
messing with table formatting a lot when I use <> to reduce the size of the
column. It works even worse with links of the type [[link][link label]] and
when I use org
Hello Nicolas, hello Heikki,
> Heikki Lehvaslaiho writes:
>> I can not see any change in function with the new code. Alphabetical
>> sorting is fixedly case sensitive.
Is your Emacs≤24? Emacs (surprisingly) only gained a facility for
alphabetic (locale-sensitive) sorting with ver. 25. Before th
Diogo Ferrari writes:
> from github, The version there is 9.13.1 and the problem remains
We don't use Github. You can find development version here:
https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode
from github, The version there is 9.13.1 and the problem remains
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 3:13 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Diogo Ferrari writes:
>
> > Can I clone that version?
>
> What do you mean?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou0x
Hello,
Heikki Lehvaslaiho writes:
> I can not see any change in function with the new code. Alphabetical
> sorting is fixedly case sensitive.
>
> I am definitely running the new code for org-table-sort-lines at the head
> of the master branch. I can see there have been changes. Universal argumen
Hello,
Ken Mankoff writes:
> The issues are 1) there is no "post text" exported. The "bar post
> text" discusses the results of the source block above it, but is not
> exported to the code file as comments, and 2) The Foo text is not
> exported either, but contains info relevant to the Bar code.
