On Sunday, 18 Jun 2017 at 20:45, Narendra Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am curious about how people organize a project and its sub-tasks. For
> example, say building a website. Do you make the task a TODO task and
> then have TODO tasks under it? I don't like that the project appears in
> my org-agenda
I also think Org-mode table src block content to override file is dangerous.
I have another idea. Append src block content to end of file.
I have a sceniro:
File `dotfile-1.org`:
```
* SSH config 1
#+BEGIN_SRC conf :tangle "~/.ssh/config"
fragment 1
#+END_SRC
```
File `dotfile-2.org`:
```
* SS
I found noweb reference with argument `<>` issue.
This can work:
```org
#+NAME: f1
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=7 :results value
(+ x x)
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: f1
: 14
#+NAME: f2
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=7 :results value
(+ x 2)
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: f2
: 9
#+name: intermediate
#+call:
"Charles C. Berry" writes:
[...]
> It sounds like you are re-inventing version control and wanting it to be
> implemented in org-babel-tangle.
>
> `org-babel-tangle' can do a lot of work to assemble the files that result
> from tangling. Modifying `org-babel-tangle' to do what you ask would
Hello,
1. Open the attached org file using emacs -Q org-indent-text.org
I have emacs version "GNU Emacs 25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+
Version 3.22.10) of 2017-04-22" and thus org version 8.2.10
2. Change to a built-in dark theme: (load-theme 'tsdh-dark)
3. SHIFT-TAB a bit, everything lo
Hi Eric.
The standard clocking task mechanism will do it fine.
Great.
However, since there are many multiple small observations along
one task, maybe a capture template is a bit overdo...
I find that capturing is a lightweight activity. It all depends
on what
you expect to have to do.
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> There is absolutely no drawback in using lexical binding. Since Emacs
> 24.1, it _is_ the default for Elisp: every Elisp file created activates
> it, the other binding being for compatibility with older libraries.
Maybe I miss something: when I create a fil
Hi,
I am curious about how people organize a project and its sub-tasks. For
example, say building a website. Do you make the task a TODO task and
then have TODO tasks under it? I don't like that the project appears in
my org-agenda as a separate thing along with its sub-tasks. How do you
handle th
Try this to get the heading you want. It seems to work for me.
#
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/17445/how-can-i-change-the-references-to-reference-in-the-thebibliography-environm
# This makes the bibliography section title empty and un-numbered
#+latex: \renewcommand{\bibsection}{\subsec
Bastien Guerry writes:
> I agree it's good to have lexical scoping, but I don't consider Elisp
> to be lexical scopped -- I consider Elisp to let the user pick up the
> constraints he wants, with dynamic binding still being the default.
Not at all. Lexical binding is still the way to go. If you
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Bastien Guerry writes:
>
>> Still: when it is not used, why adding it?
>
> We are not adding it since it is in the file by default; you removed
> it :)
I guess it is in the file by default because the odds are good that
lexical scoping will be actually use
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017, Chunyang Xu wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
[...]
I don't think it is a good idea to have file that can be both edited
manually, and auto-generated (i.e., tangled). Or, to put it differently,
the idea behind tangling is that you only handle the code block, not the
file it
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
[...]
> I don't think it is a good idea to have file that can be both edited
> manually, and auto-generated (i.e., tangled). Or, to put it differently,
> the idea behind tangling is that you only handle the code block, not the
> file itself.
I still think overriding exis
I'm at the stage of building an org-mode table to be exported to
mediawiki and its going to be the front page of my DrugFacts site.
So far I'm here -
--8<---cut here---start->8---
| *Illegal* | *Category's* |*Legal*
Hello,
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Still: when it is not used, why adding it?
We are not adding it since it is in the file by default; you removed
it :)
This is an odd question, however. The thing is: how is Emacs-lisp
scoping, dynamic or lexical? We ought not consider it to be both
throughout th
On Saturday, 17 Jun 2017 at 23:13, ed...@openmail.cc wrote:
> What is an ECM and how do I produce it? (this is a honest question).
Sorry: French for minimal but complete example so that others can try to
reproduce the problem. See the FAQ:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html
--
: Eric S Fraga
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I'm not sure to understand commit
> a023d670eceb9121ef6a511b108fd82265e6d6a8. In particular, why did
> you remove lexical binding? It really should be active in every
> library, and is the default when you create a new one.
I didn't know lexical binding wa
I have a habit that I'd like to perform every day or so in the lead up
to an event, but after the event date I would like to be marked
permanently done and never again appear in the agenda.
Is there a way to do this automatically? I've tried with a combination
of scheduled and deadlines, but the
Hello Nicolas,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017, 3:16 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
>
> As I said, I was only nitpicking. Feel free to fix it, or not.
>
OK, thanks for confirming. I'll leave out this edit then.
> --
Kaushal Modi
Hello,
Chunyang Xu writes:
> Currently 'C-c C-v C-t' ('org-babel-tangle') simply overrides existing
> tangle-file, I would like org to ask me what to do? such as
>
> a) yes (override)
> b) no (don't override)
> c) show the diff then ask again
>
> In addition, if there is no diff (i.e., having th
Hello,
Kaushal Modi writes:
> Thanks. I pushed the patch, but I missed making the when -> and change. Do
> you want me to fix that in another commit? Though, functionally they are
> the same, and 'make test' is passing.
As I said, I was only nitpicking. Feel free to fix it, or not.
Regards,
-
21 matches
Mail list logo
