Hi all,
I finally got annoyed enough to debug a problem with the timezone field
in the .ics export of my agenda.
Turns out the problem was simple: org-icalendar--vcalendar was being
called with the wrong argument order in
org-icalendar-export-current-agenda, so the timezone was going into the
des
Hi Andreas,
Andreas writes:
> Hi list,
> I was hoping to get some help with this issue
>
> I use:
> Org-mode version 8.3.3 (release_8.3.3-468-gf3f4b2)
> GNU Emacs 25.1.50.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16.7) of 2016-01-17
> ess-version: 15.09-2 patched [git: 6d05ba7c89371764c43e30a436d71
Hi list,
I was hoping to get some help with this issue
I use:
Org-mode version 8.3.3 (release_8.3.3-468-gf3f4b2)
GNU Emacs 25.1.50.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16.7) of 2016-01-17
ess-version: 15.09-2 patched [git: 6d05ba7c89371764c43e30a436d7166417cabd4d]
julia version 0.4.2
I'm trying
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> What's wrong with equation (potentially coupled with mathtools for
>> handling numbering automatically)? Is it worth breaking old documents
>> (irrespective of org-lint) for this inconvenience?
>
> Actually, the idea behind this patch is
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>> Eventually, I think at least ox-texinfo.el, ox-man.el and ox-groff.el
>>> need a similar trick.
>>
>> Perhaps there should be an error check in ox-odt as well? I guess the
>> only thing that could happen is that the zip/odt can’t be written, which
>> could happen if i
Hi Nicolas,
· Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thomas Holst writes:
>
>> for my work flow I would like to set up a capture template based on the
>> ideas described in:
>>
>> http://www.jboecker.de/2010/04/14/general-reference-filing-with-org-mode.html#sec-5
>>
>> The original is based on rem
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> That and the fact that one might introduce forbidden characters in the
> name (e.g., ask the user to know about forbidden characters in the
> target format). The generic names are pretty safe.
>
> Anyway, what about using special blocks to
Hello,
Thomas Holst writes:
> for my work flow I would like to set up a capture template based on the
> ideas described in:
>
> http://www.jboecker.de/2010/04/14/general-reference-filing-with-org-mode.html#sec-5
>
> The original is based on remember but I want to use capture. The
> principle is
Hi,
for my work flow I would like to set up a capture template based on the
ideas described in:
http://www.jboecker.de/2010/04/14/general-reference-filing-with-org-mode.html#sec-5
The original is based on remember but I want to use capture. The
principle is as follows:
In the capture template r
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> Since this is a bugfix I guess you should use org-sublist (*shiver*) in
> maint and cl-subseq in master. We can’t use cl-lib in maint, right
> Nicolas?
Absolutely.
>> Eventually, I think at least ox-texinfo.el, ox-man.el and ox-groff.el
>> need a similar trick.
>
> Per
Hello,
Derek Feichtinger writes:
> The thing which made it hard for me to identify the initial problem was
> that the test CLOCK lines I had in the testing file where placed there
> without a heading. When later in the day I wanted to clock in to my tasks,
> I then just ended up with a "outline
Hello,
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> I've got this
>
> ** The quick red fox
>
>#+BEGIN_QUOTE
>red foxes are great
>#+END_QUOTE
>
>jumped over the lazy brown dog.
>
> But when I export to HTML I see the
>
>
>
> 1.5
>The quick red fox
>
>
>
>
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> What's wrong with equation (potentially coupled with mathtools for
> handling numbering automatically)? Is it worth breaking old documents
> (irrespective of org-lint) for this inconvenience?
Actually, the idea behind this patch is to mimic the expected LaTeX
behaviour,
Hi Nicolas
Ok, that makes sense, then. Probably there are other users who indeed will
rely on clocking in non-agenda files.
The thing which made it hard for me to identify the initial problem was
that the test CLOCK lines I had in the testing file where placed there
without a heading. When later
Hello,
Adam Aviv writes:
> Interesting. I don't know if it is a bug, though, as this seems intentional
> and matches my experience. The idea being that if you want to label
> something, you use the :name tag, but this will make it so the second item
> is evaluated, producing a unique identifier.
15 matches
Mail list logo