Thank you Kyle. I wrote to that tread - hope they might be able to help me.
Regarding the above behavior being documented - I believe not. The
reason I believe it does not require specific documentation. Because
this is default behavior to filter by empty tag. How else would one
filter to get only
Dear Gustav, Eric,
I was referred to your subject discussion in respect to my problem:
With new version of org-mode I am now unable to filter agenda to show
only non-tagged items:
> "sgeorgii ." writes:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Having installed latest org 8.3.2 I am now having the subject problem:
>
Hi,
I am trying to find a nice way to change the color of some links. So far
the only solution I have found is to create a new face, and use
highlight-regexp to do it.
I would prefer to just use font-lock to change the color of the link. so
far I have not found a way to do that.
I have found the
Hello,
Manuel Koell writes:
> I would like to see such option so someone can create a setupfile with
> macros/options per project or target (component). The setupfiles can be
> located in the project directory then. I dont know how to set macros in
> publishing components. Otherwise, you'd have
> > I just noticed that upon editing a table formula, C-u C-c C-c was updating
> > all
> but the first instance of formula (all but the first row).
> >
> > Org-mode version 8.3.2
> >
> > Could this be related issue?
>
> If it was, I can't reproduce it with the latest pull that fixed my
>
Hello,
"sgeorgii ." writes:
> Hello!
>
> Having installed latest org 8.3.2 I am now having the subject problem:
>
> M-x org-agenda
>
> When in agenda:
>
> / (filter)
>
> TAB (filter by tag)
>
> (without entering any tags for "Tag:" question)
>
> Before this gave me agenda view filtered to show
I've been doing some testing of org-publish functions and have found a
few problems with org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing. They arise
from the fact that it attempts to take included files into account.
The logic is simple enough: while a file may not have changed, the files
it includes may
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Rainer M Krug writes:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I want to add a todo note (from the todonotes package) in a figure
>>> environment. What I want should look as follow, so that the to note sits
>>> in the environment (based on [http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/256
Rasmus writes:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to add a todo note (from the todonotes package) in a figure
>> environment. What I want should look as follow, so that the to note sits
>> in the environment (based on [http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/256802/6941]
>> ):
>>
>> ,
>> |
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Hi
>
> I want to add a todo note (from the todonotes package) in a figure
> environment. What I want should look as follow, so that the to note sits
> in the environment (based on [http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/256802/6941]
> ):
>
> ,
> | \begin{figure}[htb]
> | \cent
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Hi Rainer,
>>
>> Rainer M Krug writes:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I read at tha moment a lot of mails here regarding the @@latex:...@@ (or
>>> @@html:...@@) syntax. I understand d=that these fragments are only
>>> inserted when the corresponding backend is
Hi,
Alan Schmitt writes:
>> Then the cdr of an element in org-latex-custom-lang-environments can be
>> something like:
>>
>>\begin{%e}[label=%l, myfunkyoption=val]
>> %c
>> \end{%e}
>
> What would "%e" be bound to? Since this is a customization for a given
> source block, it should b
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>> Hi
>>
>> I read at tha moment a lot of mails here regarding the @@latex:...@@ (or
>> @@html:...@@) syntax. I understand d=that these fragments are only
>> inserted when the corresponding backend is used - correct?
>>
>> Where can I f
On Tuesday, 24 Nov 2015 at 05:57, John Kitchin wrote:
> It can be, but a more typical one I use is \ce{Cu_{1-x}Pd_{x}} and that has
> to be wrapped in @@latex:...@@.
Ah, of course! Sorry for the noise.
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.5.1, Org release_8.3beta-1229-ge900eb
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Hi
>
> I read at tha moment a lot of mails here regarding the @@latex:...@@ (or
> @@html:...@@) syntax. I understand d=that these fragments are only
> inserted when the corresponding backend is used - correct?
>
> Where can I find further information on this? i
Hi
I read at tha moment a lot of mails here regarding the @@latex:...@@ (or
@@html:...@@) syntax. I understand d=that these fragments are only
inserted when the corresponding backend is used - correct?
Where can I find further information on this? i in the org-info file
does not give anything (ex
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to add a todo note (from the todonotes package) in a figure
>> environment. What I want should look as follow, so that the to note sits
>> in the environment (based on [http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/256802/6941]
>> )
It can be, but a more typical one I use is \ce{Cu_{1-x}Pd_{x}} and that has
to be wrapped in @@latex:...@@.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitch
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Hi
>
> I want to add a todo note (from the todonotes package) in a figure
> environment. What I want should look as follow, so that the to note sits
> in the environment (based on [http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/256802/6941]
> ):
>
> ,
> | \begin{figure}[htb
Hi
I want to add a todo note (from the todonotes package) in a figure
environment. What I want should look as follow, so that the to note sits
in the environment (based on [http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/256802/6941]
):
,
| \begin{figure}[htb]
| \centering
| \includegraphics[width=.9\linewidt
Hello!
Having installed latest org 8.3.2 I am now having the subject problem:
M-x org-agenda
When in agenda:
/ (filter)
TAB (filter by tag)
(without entering any tags for "Tag:" question)
Before this gave me agenda view filtered to show only non-tagged items.
I believe this was right and ju
On Monday, 23 Nov 2015 at 14:42, John Kitchin wrote:
> True enough! I wasn't thinking very large when I had the question in
> mind! I end up with a lot of chemical formulas like this
> @@latex:\ce{H_{2}O}@@ in my writing because the {} inside the {} makes
OT but just wondering: shouldn't this be
Hi Rasmus,
On 2015-11-23 18:54, Rasmus writes:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>
>> What I propose is to have either a string or a function in
>> `org-latex-custom-lang-environments'. A string would be used as it is
>> currently, whereas a function would be applied. Here is what it could
>>
23 matches
Mail list logo
