David Masterson writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> David Masterson writes:
>>> Something doesn't seem right and I'm sure I'm missing some key in
>>> understanding how its supposed to work. What I see right now seems like
>>> something doesn't match up -- particularly with the Org package:
>>>
>
Hi,
I posted something at the beginning of the week, and have received no
reply. If nobody had anything to say that is fine. But I notice that my
original post on gmane
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/84707 appears blank, so
perhaps the no reply is due to a posting issue. Hence, I sen
Achim Gratz writes:
> David Masterson writes:
>> Something doesn't seem right and I'm sure I'm missing some key in
>> understanding how its supposed to work. What I see right now seems like
>> something doesn't match up -- particularly with the Org package:
>>
>> 1. Most modern Emacs have Org pr
I am getting a strange effect from ":results pp" and ob-clojure. "It\n
looks\n like\n this.\n" I built Emacs 24.4.50 from trunk and cloned
ob-clojure from git today. clojure-mode is 20140331 from ELPA. cider is
20140411 from ELPA.
Two examples follow.
1. uses =:results pp= ("and\n looks\n lik
Hello!
After you have a sparse tree, is there a way to hide away headlines and entries
that you don't actually want to be part of your final export?
There's a command to reveal context ... but is there a command that will help
you hide away context?
Thanks!
Mark
Remote possibility: I've had issues with org-mode being slow when using
linum-mode in the past:
E.g.,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5229705/emacs-org-mode-turn-off-line-numbers
So you might want to make sure that's not enabled.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Ka
Karl Voit writes:
> However, my (long) Org-mode files with the performance issues is not
> a situation I am satisfied. Last week I presented Org-mode at a
> Linuxdays-event here in Graz and I had to apologize for all the
> weird behavior. This was somewhat embarrassing :-(
Does this happen on st
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
>
> I just tried to apply the second patch, but it no longer applies (with
> "git am") to the Org-mode repo. Would you mind sending along an updated
> version?
>
Hi Eric,
The attached should apply cleanly against master.
Michael
0001-Keyb
Richard Lawrence writes:
Hi Richard,
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>
>>> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>>>
What do you think - is there any chance that Org-mode switches from
static hardcoded regexp strings (all over the place) to dynamic
regexps calculated at runti
Bastien writes:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>>
>>> What do you think - is there any chance that Org-mode switches from
>>> static hardcoded regexp strings (all over the place) to dynamic
>>> regexps calculated at runtime (using libraries like drx.el o
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> What do you think - is there any chance that Org-mode switches from
>> static hardcoded regexp strings (all over the place) to dynamic
>> regexps calculated at runtime (using libraries like drx.el or rx.el)?
>
> I hope not. The sy
Ken Mankoff writes:
Hello, Ken!
>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil)
>> put-text-property(28799 nil org-effort ":15")
>> org-refresh-properties("Effort" org-effort)
>> byte-code("\306!\203\f.q\210\202.
I think Bastien has just committed a patch
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:36 +0200, Oleh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've made an update to ob-clojure.el, which wasn't working for me with
> the new cider (the required function was removed).
>
> I haven't looked into 'nrepl or 'slime options for evaluation, is
> anyone using them?
>
> Eric, should 'nr
* Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> I am still facing strange behavior and I still do think that we
>> need an org-mode-syntax-checker for Org-mode files that cause
>> problems.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> | foo | bar | baz |
>> | 42 | | |
>> | 23 | | |
>
> I d
Hello,
Karl Voit writes:
> I am still facing strange behavior and I still do think that we
> need an org-mode-syntax-checker for Org-mode files that cause
> problems.
>
> Example:
>
> | foo | bar | baz |
> | 42 | | |
> | 23 | | |
I don't understand what a "syntax checker" has
* Bastien wrote:
> Hi Eric and Karl,
Hi Bastien!
> Just checking -- are things better now?
I am still facing strange behavior and I still do think that we
need an org-mode-syntax-checker for Org-mode files that cause
problems.
Example:
| foo | bar | baz |
| 42 | | |
| 23 | |
Achim Gratz writes:
>> 1. Most modern Emacs have Org pre-installed.
>> 2. Unfortunately, that Org is not up-to-date (24.3 has 7.9.3f).
>> 3. Therefore, installing the latest Org package seems natural.
>
> The pitfall here is that you _must_ do the first install of the Org
> package from an Emacs t
David Masterson writes:
> I still need more understanding of the Emacs packaging system.
That's a question you better ask of the Emacs developers, after you've
read the documentation.
> Something doesn't seem right and I'm sure I'm missing some key in
> understanding how its supposed to work. Wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
