Hi Michael,
Michael Hannon writes:
> Hi, folks. Just FYI:
>
> - Forwarded Message -
>>From: Yihui Xie
>>To: Stephen Eglen
>>Cc: ess-h...@r-project.org
>>Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 3:08 PM
>>Subject: Re: [ESS] knitr
>>
>>There is no point comparing markdown with org mode, and the
Hi Yagnesh,
Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala writes:
> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp
> (message "* one
> ** two")
> #+END_SRC
You can use
#+BEGIN_SRC elisp
(message "* one\n** two")
#+END_SRC
HTH,
--
Bastien
Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get numbered equations in Beamer, hence using the begin_equation
> block, but the formula is not correctly translated to LaTeX, and I have no
> clue why...
>
Confirmed (except that I have to comment out hyperref in order to
process the latex
Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get numbered equations in Beamer, hence using the begin_equation
> block, but the formula is not correctly translated to LaTeX, and I have no
> clue why...
>
> Here an ECM:
> ...
> - These should be numbered:
>
> #+begin_equation
> \frac{1}{\
> Hi all
>
> Is there a way to have automatic alignments in the Org buffer with M-q
> (fill-paragraph) and C-c C-c like:
>
> - cmd ::short term + short descr
> - cmd -o :: short term + short descr
> - cmd --log-level=err -o ::
> long
Hi, Org people!
GitHub renders a README.md file right at the end of the project page,
using bigger fonts for titles, producing clickable links, and such
things. As I did not feel like maintaining the same information both in
Org and Markdown format, I used the Org -> [org-publish] -> HTML ->
[Pan
I've just started using org-mode, and so far find it quite
useful. I have a very large collection of technical papers in a
directory tree, and I'd like to go through them and index them
through org-mode. What I'd like is to have a way of going through
them and look at the unannotated ones, and anno
Hello,
I'm trying to get numbered equations in Beamer, hence using the begin_equation
block, but the formula is not correctly translated to LaTeX, and I have no
clue why...
Here an ECM:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+TITLE: ECM Equations
#+DATE: 2012
Hi Bastien, Thanks! That's just what I was looking for.
Victor
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> Victor Miller writes:
>
> > I've recently discovered org-mode, and have started using it.
> > However, the version of org-mode on my work system is on
> > 6.36. Ther
Victor Miller writes:
> I've recently discovered org-mode, and have started using it.
> However, the version of org-mode on my work system is on
> 6.36. There is no chance of getting it updated (at least not in
> the near future). I'd like to have a version of document that
> corresponds to that
Hello.,
Please try to export attachment org file. the bug is reproduced with minimal
configuration. org version is: Org-mode version 7.8.10
(release_7.8.10-649-gfe2e2f @ /home/yagnesh/.emacs.d/el-get/org-mode/lisp/)
FYI, generated latex file is also attached.
* Headline
#+BEGIN_SRC elisp
(me
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Victor Miller wrote:
> Suvayu, Thanks for the reply, but, as I said, it's impossible for me to
> update a new version of org-mode. Our work systems are not connected to the
> internet, and there is no possibility of bringing in any updates.
My second suggestion ab
Hi Achim
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Please do a 'git fetch --tags origin' — you seem to have pulled the
> non-annotated release tag for 7.8.11 before Bastien corrected it.
Oh yes, thanks for reminding me on that. I fetched tags after the
annonuncement on 2012-04-11 to d
Hi Victor,
Victor Miller writes:
> I've recently discovered org-mode, and have started using it.
> However, the version of org-mode on my work system is on
> 6.36. There is no chance of getting it updated (at least not in
> the near future). I'd like to have a version of document that
> correspo
Hello Victor,
Welcome to Org-mode.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Victor Miller wrote:
> I've recently discovered org-mode, and have started using it.
> However, the version of org-mode on my work system is on
> 6.36. There is no chance of getting it updated (at least not in
> the near future).
I've recently discovered org-mode, and have started using it.
However, the version of org-mode on my work system is on
6.36. There is no chance of getting it updated (at least not in
the near future). I'd like to have a version of document that
corresponds to that version. Where can I find it?
V
Achim Gratz writes:
> * contrib/lisp/org-e-html.el: Remove declarations and replace with
> require.
Thanks for this. I have applied some hunks. The rest I will revisit at
opportune moment.
I have also taken care of org-e-odt.
--
[re-sent, sorry if you get this twice]
Michael Brand writes:
> With an Org file containing only "* a\n" the old exporter is ok but the
> new exporter release_7.8.10-633 on 23.3.1 makes an ODT reported as
> "corrupt" by OOo. Attached are the Org and ODT exported as old, new
> and new repaired by OO
Hi Jambunathan
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Michael Brand
wrote:
[...]
> see attached backtrace
[...]
It seems to me you made the recent commit release_7.8.11-37-gec368e8
for my backtrace. So I tested and can confirm that it is resolved.
Also my original issue with the corrupt ODT is resolved
Ok -- just realized I had left in the selection of a custom
org-capture-template which will likely not be in anyone else's config,
so I made the org-capture-template configurable, and set to nil by default.
Modified script below..
...cj
-- OutlookToEmacsOrg
--
-- This script uses org-protocol
Hi Folks,
I thought I'd share a bit of hacking I've been doing over the last
couple days.
I had 2 basic needs:
* create a TODO entry associated with an email message
* include a clickable link back to that message in the entry
For work email I use Outlook on a Mac. After some digging, I
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> Looking at the documentation and also the website and Worg, I see that
>> we still use all these monikers interchangeably in both capitalized and
>> lowercase form throughout. I seem to remember that there was some
>> discussion that only one o
22 matches
Mail list logo
