Hello all,
Hoping someone might be help me diagnose this problem. I recently
changed my linux distro from ubuntu to arch linux. I had an org-file
that was running very well (over a year) up until the switch over. I
have monthly entries separated into separate src ledger code blocks.
When I do
At Sat, 7 Apr 2012 21:22:59 +0200,
Michael Brand wrote:
>
> Hi James
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 17:59, James Harkins wrote:
> > How to make a TODO agenda search that will show only #A priority items? (Or
> > #B or #C?)
> > I see in the manual how to search on tags or properties, but not priorit
Hi James
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 17:59, James Harkins wrote:
> How to make a TODO agenda search that will show only #A priority items? (Or
> #B or #C?)
> I see in the manual how to search on tags or properties, but not priorities.
The manual has an example for matching PRIORITY, linked from seve
Bastien writes:
> Can you send each patch in a separate email using
> `git format-patch'?
Here's the second one.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
>From b088bfff32d024ec67fcf8ee0812244128198d93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Sperber
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2
Bastien writes:
> Can you send each patch in a separate email using
> `git format-patch'?
Attached. The second one will follow shortly.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
>From 18a83ce61fb420e85987e77f8506c01023a22c16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Spe
Hello all,
I'm very happy with all the new features I discovered in org-babel
(since 6.8 or so) and played around a lot trying to convert my old
funnelweb-techniques (kind of LPstuff) into org-babel and now I'm a
little confused with all that elaborated stuff like header arguments,
result opt
How to make a TODO agenda search that will show only #A priority items? (Or #B
or #C?)
I see in the manual how to search on tags or properties, but not priorities. I
suppose I can write a custom function, but I don't see documentation on the
argument(s) passed to that function.
In the end, I w
Hi!
I have attached a patch for org-mobile.el which adds four additional edit
nodes. They seem to work and adding and deleting has already been
implemented "client-side wise" in mobileorg-android.
The current versions could be improved by using the "old value" to compare
it to the current, as to
Hi, Samuel,
On 4/6/12 8:41 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Christian and others,
Will CSS solutions described in this thread work if you always export
subtrees (not entire .org files) and never include style files?
Yes, CSS styles apply to exported subtrees as well, whether from the
default styleshe
* lisp/org-bbdb.el: (org-bbdb-anniv-extract-date)
(org-bbdb-make-anniv-hash) Fix org-bbdb anniversary functionality to
accommodate bbdb 3.x. There are two major changes in bbdb 3.x that
need to be taken into account. The first is that bbdb-split
reverses the order of its parameters in 3.x
Bastien writes:
>
> I fixed the problem with `org-clock-state'. This should be `org-state'.
>
> `state' is a local variable in many org.el functions, I renamed it to
> `org-state' in org-clock.el and in "caller" sexp from org.el.
>
Attached please find a patch that fixes the docstring of
org-a
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is there a way to define an agenda filter that will search in only one of the
> agenda files? The
> reason I do that is because although I have several files added to the
> agenda, only one contains
> "actionable items" (gtd.org).
There are multip
On Apr 7, 2012 4:28 AM, "Bastien" wrote:
>
> John Hendy writes:
>
> > Cool! Great idea and thanks for paving the way,
>
> Thanks.
>
> The question now is: on what Worg pages should we have this
> comment system?
>
True. And how to balance the mailing list vs disqus... While thw mailing
list is g
Hi Erich,
Neuwirth Erich writes:
> I could not find the option to set language sensitive font locking in source
> code blocks.
> Is there such an option?
(setq org-src-fontify-natively t)
HTH,
--
Bastien
I could not find the option to set language sensitive font locking in source
code blocks.
Is there such an option?
John Hendy writes:
> Cool! Great idea and thanks for paving the way,
Thanks.
The question now is: on what Worg pages should we have this
comment system?
For now, I let any worger decide about this -- we are at an
experimental stage.
As for me, I tend to think comments are more useful on blog
16 matches
Mail list logo