According to the online documentation [1], it seems that :BEAMER_envargs:
should apply to all Beamer environments:
~~~
BEAMER_envargs
The beamer-special arguments that should be used for the environment, like
[t] or [<+->] of <2-3>. If the BEAMER_col property is also set, something like
C[t
Hi Renger,
why not use two differently configured agenda blocks in your agenda
view. In the first you skip habits and in the second you skip everything
else.
Cheers,
Viktor
Renger van Nieuwkoop wrote:
> Hi
> I want to change my agenda view in such a way, that habits are shown as an
> explicit
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
> However try replacing
> > :var: foo="a"
> with
> > :var+: foo="a"
> which is valid and should work for your use case below.
I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but even if I replace "var"
with "var+" in the child's property drawer, the value of bar that is
François Pinard wrote:
> pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
>
> > Roughly copying code from here and there (and not even understanding it,
> > some dead code might remain), I turned your function into the
> > following:
>
> Hmph! There seemingly is a problem however.
>
> I trie
Great way of doing it.
Another option is to create a new buffer and sort the headers by the
weight. Ideally each header in the new buffer would be a link.
Yet another is to use the agenda. I think it might have a new format
string option for the weight. Then use the agenda to sort.
And anothe
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> Roughly copying code from here and there (and not even understanding it,
> some dead code might remain), I turned your function into the
> following:
Hmph! There seemingly is a problem however.
I tried it on a few files, and it usually does it
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
>> My need here is to get an estimate of the weight of displayed headers.
> The following function will give you the number of sub-headings and
> paragraphs (or equivalent, i.e. tables verse-blocks).
Wow, thanks!
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> According to `org-footnote-renumber-fn:N' docstring, renumbering only
> applies to simple footnotes like fn:17. This is also is the manual, at
> section 2.10.
>
>
> Regards,
Hello.
You are right. Please, consider this bug report as feature request.
Best r
Erik Butz writes:
Hi,
> I didn't use the org-taskjuggler3 resource, but below[1] are some
> changes that I made in the org-taskjuggler.el file. With these I can
> export e.g. the default example file at:
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-taskjuggler.html to a
> taskjuggler file and hav
Hi
I want to change my agenda view in such a way, that habits are shown as an
explicit block below my agenda, but my solution (shown below) shows the habits
still in my agenda view and without all the nice tracking color and symbols in
the block below the agenda. It might be simple, but I don't
Consider the following org table
| Component | Price | Var-1 | Var-2 | Var-3 | Var-4 |
|+++++|
| CPU A | 119.90 | 1 | 1 |||
| CPU B | 189.9
Hello,
oitofe...@gmail.com (Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro) writes:
> Org-mode don't renumber plain footnote labels, like '[2]', with the key
> command "C-u C-c C-x f r".
>
According to `org-footnote-renumber-fn:N' docstring, renumbering only
applies to simple footnotes like fn:17. This
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
Hi list,
I tried to write an org file for a project plan with the aim to export
it using taskjuggler 3.1.0.
besides following the advice from these two source:
,--
| http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-02/msg00
Tests for experimental org features (e.g. from contrib/ ) should expect
to fail when the user has not configured their inclusion into the
current setup. In other words, things like "(require org-element)"
should not break the test run, but instead just note that this test has
failed expectedly an
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
Thorsten writes:
> Hi List,
> I added the documentation page for the org babel language picolisp to
> worg. You can find it here:
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-picolisp.html
Wow. Nice job!
Now there are 26 empty Documentation cells in the table on
http://orgmode
Hi Peter
Thanks for testing hidestarsfile. I just published fileconversion
version 0.2 (generalized name and functionality) with a speed-up [1]
and many other improvements. So please check out again:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html#fileconversion
> [...] Even better would be if the
> stars
Hello,
I have been writing a parser for mlorg files in OCaml. This started as an
experiment to see if the literate programming mode of org-mode could scale to a
full application (among other things).
The project is at its beginning but can « bootstrap » itself (that is parses its
own source and e
on Tue Jan 24 2012, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On 23.1.2012, at 16:27, Alexander Corvinus wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just reviewed code in org.el and noticed that function
>> org-show-subtree, which is called by org-cycle, unconditionally
>> shows whole subtree (exactly what I wanted to have in
On Sun, Feb 26 2012, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I didn't look at the code but you probably mean
> (org-element-parse-buffer 'headline) if you're only interested in
> headline data.
Yes, it's "headline" in the code... :)
--
Peter
On Sun, Feb 26 2012, Nick Dokos wrote:
> So orgntf-todo-list takes the lion's share of the time but
> most of it is the 15 calls to org-element-parse-buffer
Ok, then I could process only one file at a time. This would divide the
processing time by 15, in your case. But perhaps others would have t
Getting deeper into beamer export and enjoying it -- props to the responsible
developers.
A point of fine print that escaped me in the available documentation -- maybe I
just overlooked, but probably this is something that should be clarified.
When doing a buffer export, #+BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL re
>From e640d3e9fe99c4cb2f2282bf355d0a1d28c33414 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Gehring
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:10:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] doc/org.texi: add tiny stylistic improvements
---
doc/org.texi |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/or
>From e56f7f204014ce6e2b83a75caeb248dd63a6c74f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Gehring
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:51:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] doc/org.texi: remove duplicated keybinding for
'org-refile-cache-clear'
---
doc/org.texi |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions
Hello,
oitofe...@gmail.com (Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro) writes:
> Consider the following org code:
>
> --
> This is only a text.[1]
>
> [1] This is a text body's footnote.[2]
> [2] This is a footnote's footnote.
> --
>
> When org-mode exports this code to html, despite the fact that
> footnote 2
Hello,
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> Here is a need I have once in a while, but for which I do not even have
> realistic suggestions to offer (at least, so I feel). Maybe someone
> would offer more precise ideas. :-)
>
> When I have a big Org file which I want to re-organiz
Hello,
Peter Münster writes:
> On Sat, Feb 25 2012, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
>> A quick first impression: orgntf-process seems expensive. It seems
>> to take 100% of one core (I've got a quad-core processor) for three or
>> four seconds every fifty seconds. Unfortunately, the core is the same one
>>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:16, wrote:
> I have been using the function oog in org-occur-goto.el to search any
> open file, so somewhere in that file is a way to find open files. What
> remains is to use some condition from this file to declare
> org-refile-targets. I understand that a functio
29 matches
Mail list logo