[O] custom agenda command with function doesn't work

2012-01-19 Thread Juan Queipo de Llano Moya
Hello, I'm trying to write a custom agenda command that cycles through a list of names and builds an agenda block for each one with his tasks. I wrote a command, that I have called org-sec-tasksbymember that throws a list of tags-todo with the parameters I want. For example, for a list of me

Re: [O] [bug] Tables in lists not exported to ODT

2012-01-19 Thread Jambunathan K
> One comment: for tables that are indented, it probably makes sense to > have the table take up 100% of the width available to it? Do you want to maximize the real-estate available for tables - indented or otherwise. Indentation for tables consume some real estate. Are you saying that you wan

Re: [O] refiling tasks and counter cookies

2012-01-19 Thread Ali Tofigh
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:14, Bastien wrote: > Hi Ali, > > Ali Tofigh writes: > >> when refiling todos (C-c C-w), the counter cookies don't update. is >> that a known/intended issue? > > This should do: > > (add-hook >  'org-after-refile-insert-hook >  'org-update-parent-todo-statistics) what I

Re: [O] Minimal overhead Org-mode blogging system

2012-01-19 Thread Steinar Bang
> Puneeth Chaganti : > This is totally home brew stuff. Well, thank you for sharing this home brew stuff. I've been trying to use the other org based blog solutions, but they have all failed for some reason or other, and they have also seemed abandoned. > Sorry for the trouble you are hav

Re: [O] functions from cl package called at runtime

2012-01-19 Thread Eric Schulte
> >> Also, while intersection below is a function defined in cl-seq, the use >> of `intersection' in ob.el refers to a local function and not the cl-seq >> function, so it should be fine. > > The byte-compiler thinks otherwise, so I'd check that assumption > again... but it might be a good idea to

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Bernt Hansen
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Bernt, > > Bernt Hansen wrote: >> Eeek! >> >> I'm not running into this (as far as I know) in my current setup but I >> vote we just revert the clocking restriction patches. There are other >> unresolved issues with these patches that I've seen and don't current

Re: [O] latex export of #+header: lines

2012-01-19 Thread Jambunathan K
Andreas Leha writes: > Andreas Leha writes: > >> "Sebastien Vauban" >> writes: >> >> >>> Hi Andreas, >>> >>> Andreas Leha wrote: I am experiencing a problem with the latex exporter: #+header: lines are visible in the exported file. Example: /==

Re: [O] [ODT] image scaling overridden by long caption

2012-01-19 Thread Jambunathan K
Hello Andreas > Hi all, > > I experience unexpected behaviour with the excellent odt exporter in case of > included images. > When I add a #+caption the text width of that caption overrides the > specified image width (#ATTR_ODT: :witdh X), which I use to downscale > the image in the odt. > Especi

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

2012-01-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Eric Schulte writes: > Thanks for taking the time to collect these changes into a patch, > however I believe the changes you describe present /new/ behavior (e.g., > new export semantics for drawers), rather than a bug repair. I'd rather say that its intent is to fix an old bug: incomple

Re: [O] functions from cl package called at runtime

2012-01-19 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Schulte writes: > Is there a convention for which macros from cl-macs are allowable and > which are forbidden? You might want to ask on the Emacs list, but my understanding is that no Emacs core packages should depend on cl _at runtime_, but it is OK to use the cl package during byte-compila

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

2012-01-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Martyn Jago writes: > These changes /have/ caused a software regression, and should be > reverted immediately, since: > > - they change current expected and implemented behavior to the cost of > users expectations and current use, with no prior discussion and > agreement on behavior c

Re: [O] functions from cl package called at runtime

2012-01-19 Thread Eric Schulte
Thanks for catching this, I've just pushed up a fix. Is there a convention for which macros from cl-macs are allowable and which are forbidden? For example `flet' is used extensively throughout the Org-mode code base. Is the convention that macros are allowable while functions are not? Also, wh

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

2012-01-19 Thread Eric Schulte
Martyn Jago writes: > Hi > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Eric Schulte writes: >> >>> Well maybe we should roll back this change. >> >> Please don't. _That_ would be a regression. >> > > These changes /have/ caused a software regression, and should be > reverted immediately, since

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

2012-01-19 Thread Eric Schulte
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric Schulte writes: > >> Well maybe we should roll back this change. > > Please don't. _That_ would be a regression. > >> I'll wait to see if Nicolas has a solution which is both functional and >> conforms to the Org-mode wide syntax norms. > > The problem

[O] C-u C-c C-q refuses to work, sometimes

2012-01-19 Thread François Pinard
Hi to my fellow Orgers! In (org) Setting tags, there is in the paragraph for `C-c C-q (`org-set-tags-command')': When called with a `C-u' prefix, all tags in the current buffer will be aligned to that column, just to make things look nice. If I open file "epsilon.org" with the cursor at the

[O] rfc: link type "html"

2012-01-19 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
IIUC, "opening" the link type "http" triggers ‘browse-url’ which eventually wants to talk to a server using URL that begins with "http://";, and opening the link type "file" basically triggers ‘find-file’. What if i want to ‘browse-url’ with scheme "file://"? That is, i don't want to bother going

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Bastien
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > FYI, I have the (subjective) impression that the below bug just came up a > couple of days ago. I would say less than one calendar week. But I may be > wrong. Same here. -- Bastien

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bernt, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Eeek! > > I'm not running into this (as far as I know) in my current setup but I > vote we just revert the clocking restriction patches. There are other > unresolved issues with these patches that I've seen and don't currently > have a fix for. > > Please revert th

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Bernt Hansen
Correction to the commit SHA1s - 7a73e15 (Remove file restrictions when generating clock report data, 2012-01-09) - 8f93a75 (Honour existing restrictions when visiting tasks from the agenda, 2011-12-30) - c41a6f5 (Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda, 2011-12-30)

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

2012-01-19 Thread Rick Frankel
On 19.01.2012 07:10, Martyn Jago wrote: Hi Nicolas Goaziou writes: Hello, Eric Schulte writes: Well maybe we should roll back this change. Please don't. _That_ would be a regression. These changes /have/ caused a software regression, and should be reverted immediately, since: Also

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Bastien
Hi Bernt and Matt, Bernt Hansen writes: > Bastien/Carsten: > > Please revert the following commits (again). Sorry :( Done. Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Bernt Hansen
Eeek! I'm not running into this (as far as I know) in my current setup but I vote we just revert the clocking restriction patches. There are other unresolved issues with these patches that I've seen and don't currently have a fix for. - column view clocking totals on the agenda are wrong if a

[O] [bug] Table editing is enabled in source code blocks!

2012-01-19 Thread Sebastien Vauban
#+TITLE: Table editing is enabled in source code blocks! #+AUTHOR:Seb Vauban #+DATE: 2012-01-19 * Summary "Table editing" comes into play when editing source code blocks! * Example #+begin_src sh ls *.org \ | grep this #+end_src Take the above code: 1. Go at the end of "this"

Re: [O] [PATCH 2/3] Honour existing restrictions when clocking in from the agenda

2012-01-19 Thread Matt Lundin
Hi Bernt, Bernt Hansen writes: > * lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agenda-clock-in): Save restriction when clocking in > from the agenda > > Narrowed org buffers are now retained when clocking in from the agenda. > We only widen the buffer when the task to clock in is outside the existing > restriction

[O] IMAP support for VM links in orgmode (org-vm.el)

2012-01-19 Thread Konrad Hinsen
The attached patch (relative to yesterday's state of the orgmode git repository) adds the possibility to have org-mode links to IMAP folders in VM and to messages inside IMAP folders. It requires VM 8.2.0a or later. IMAP links have the format vm-imap:account:imap-folder-name for a fol

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

2012-01-19 Thread Martyn Jago
Hi Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric Schulte writes: > >> Well maybe we should roll back this change. > > Please don't. _That_ would be a regression. > These changes /have/ caused a software regression, and should be reverted immediately, since: - they change current expected and imp

Re: [O] Verbatim URL in HTML export

2012-01-19 Thread Kristian Frisk
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:47, Leo Alekseyev wrote: > I would like to have a plain-text URL with no formatting in my HTML > output. I can't figure out how to avoid having it turn into a link on > HTML export. Surrounding it with ~tildes~ puts it in a block, > which is not what I need; I simply