[O] [PATCH] Documentation of :results wrap

Aloha all, The attached patch to the Org mode manual describes the current behavior of :results wrap. All the best, Tom >From bc7b5fe2cc52de4468cf847e72cb0a507ebb1626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Dye Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:38:53 -1000 Subject: [PATCH] * doc/org.texi: :results wrap pr

Re: [O] Agenda buffer and relative links

Hi François, François Pinard wrote: > pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: > >> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article >> that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well. > > Hmph, I now wonder if the link is bidirectional, and if messages posted > to gmane.emacs.o

[O] Manual -- updating the Customization node

Hi, Org people. This is half a tease, half a report :-) Section 15.5 Customization in the Org manual says: "There are more than 180 variables that can be used to customize Org." In a recent message to the mailing list, someone said 580 or so variables. Another gave a number over one thousand.

Re: [O] Agenda buffer and relative links

pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article > that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well. Hmph, I now wonder if the link is bidirectional, and if messages posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode actually end up on emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Re: [O] Emacs macros and capture

*Bump!* Anyone? Mueen Nawaz writes: > Hi, > > I'm seeing some weird behavior with my capture template setup. I have > the following in my capture templates: > > ("r" "Reply" entry (file+headline "~/org/gtd/gtd.org" "Reply") > "* TODO %:subject :@respond:@email: \n %u\n %i\n %a\n

Re: [O] Agenda buffer and relative links

"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi François, Hello, Sebastien! > François Pinard wrote: >> Nick Dokos writes: >>> François Pinard wrote: When Org mode defines a link for me, it sometimes changes it so it becomes relative. [...] This is OK in general, but not always. >> There is a vi

Re: [O] Problem at capture time

pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: > Hi, Org people. [...] The problem, which I described two months ago, Hmph! My math is clearly wrong! One month ago! :-) Sorry. François P.S. Who never had the the memory of times...

[O] Problem at capture time

Hi, Org people. On 2011-12-11 23:24, I reported a problem met while using the Org capture facility, and a patch working around the problem. David Maus then requested for details, which I sent on 2011-12-19 00:59. David's mailer rejected my reply as being likely SPAM, but it made it to the emacs-

[O] C-k in visual line mode

Hi, Org people. Let me suggest this tiny patch, so C-k does the proper thing in visual line mode. diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el index a8ac17d..2d0db0c 100644 --- a/lisp/org.el +++ b/lisp/org.el @@ -20491,7 +20491,8 @@ depending on context." (if (or (eq org-ctrl-k-protect-subtree

Re: [O] org-jira.el updated

Richard Riley writes: > Ken Williams writes: > >> Bao Haojun gmail.com> writes: >>> I have updated the org-jira.el as suggested by Bastien and Richard >>> Riley: >> >> Amazing. Just 120 seconds ago I got out of a meeting where we talked about >> using Jira more widely in our company, and I wor

Re: [O] [solved] Re: Org-class: recurring appointments not being displayed

On 7.1.2012, at 02:59, knubee wrote: >> * Class 7:00pm-9:00pm >> <%% (org-class 2011 1 10 2011 4 10 2 8)> > > Just figured out the problem. I was using 2011 and looking for the results in > agenda for 2012 (now). Classic "start of a new year" mistake. Doh! :) That is pretty funny! I misse