I was thinking of trying to get org and microsoft exchange talking to
each other via soap-client.el and exchange web services (ews).
Ultimately it would be nice to have a route into the corporate world
of exchange, outlook, entourage, and blackberry where so many of us
are forced to live.
My first
On 2011-06-16 15:51 +0800, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> I am unable to reproduce this. I do get an empty line the first time,
> but when the empty line is already there, then there is no problem.
>
> Do you find the insertion of this one empty line a problem?
>
> - Carsten
I am running or
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
>
> By connecting to a persistent Emacs instance much of the .el script I
> attached could be removed assuming Babel has already been configured in
> the running Emacs server.
>
> Hope this helps -- Eric
>
Eric, Nick:
Thanks, yes it does. Using also Nick's tip
Nick Dokos hp.com> writes:
> >
> You do M-x server-start on the running emacs to start the server
> part. Then you invoke emacsclient from the command line to connect to
> it - check the manpage of emacsclient for details: you might be able to
> arrange something with the --eval argument.
>
> N
Herbert Sitz writes:
> Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> The following org-mode file and minimal elisp file can be used
>> to print
>> the results of evaluating a code block from a batch Emacs
>> session
>> (note
>> this is using Emacs24, so Org-mode/Babel do not need to be
>> explic
Herbert Sitz wrote:
> Herbert Sitz nwlink.com> writes:
>
> > I'm working on Windows7 and have an Emacs client running when I issue the
> > batch command, which I assumed also means there is a running emacs server.
> > Is the
> > call getting made to the running emacs server? If so, is there
Herbert Sitz nwlink.com> writes:
> I'm working on Windows7 and have an Emacs client running when I issue the
> batch command, which I assumed also means there is a running emacs server.
> Is the
> call getting made to the running emacs server? If so, is there some way to
> avoid the startup o
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
>
> The following org-mode file and minimal elisp file can be used
> to print
> the results of evaluating a code block from a batch Emacs
> session
> (note
> this is using Emacs24, so Org-mode/Babel do not need to be
> explicitly
> loaded).
>
> I used the fo
Hi Herb,
The following org-mode file and minimal elisp file can be used to print
the results of evaluating a code block from a batch Emacs session (note
this is using Emacs24, so Org-mode/Babel do not need to be explicitly
loaded).
I used the following command line
: emacs --batch -l run-code.el
The Org manual gives an example of a batch mode --eval that runs code to tangle
code from Org files. I assume there's also a way to simply run a source code
block and get its output in the terminal but I can't see how to do it.
To give a concrete example, the Org manual uses this Python source bl
Achim Gratz writes:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>> What browser(s) are people using for this? Conkeror doesn't work well
>> at all and iceweasel (aka firefox) 3.5.19 sort of works.
>
> Although I haven't tried it recently, conkeror just uses the XULrunner
> engine that Firefox is based on. So if yo
Skip Collins wrote:
> >> Then, what about setting :cbtrans to "\\texttt{[-]}" and
> >> `org-export-latex-list-parameters' to nil, instead of "$\\boxminus$" and
> >> '(:cbon "$\\boxtimes$" :cboff "$\\Box$"), respectively?
> >>
> >
> > I'm fine with that - Skip? Tom? Others? If this does end up bei
Nick Dokos writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
>> Nick Dokos writes:
>>
>> >> Btw, is there any consensus on better default values for :cbon, :cboff
>> >> and :cbtrans? Configurability isn't an excuse for ugly standards.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I don't think so - not yet in any case. I didn't even kno
>> Then, what about setting :cbtrans to "\\texttt{[-]}" and
>> `org-export-latex-list-parameters' to nil, instead of "$\\boxminus$" and
>> '(:cbon "$\\boxtimes$" :cboff "$\\Box$"), respectively?
>>
>
> I'm fine with that - Skip? Tom? Others? If this does end up being the case,
> then Skip's \parbox
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
> >> Btw, is there any consensus on better default values for :cbon, :cboff
> >> and :cbtrans? Configurability isn't an excuse for ugly standards.
> >>
> >
> > I don't think so - not yet in any case. I didn't even know about the
> > box stuff until
Nick Dokos writes:
>> Btw, is there any consensus on better default values for :cbon, :cboff
>> and :cbtrans? Configurability isn't an excuse for ugly standards.
>>
>
> I don't think so - not yet in any case. I didn't even know about the
> box stuff until Skip brought it up. I would have thought
[OT for this discussion but just wondering if Jambunathan's
suggestions may work here]
There has been this question asked both on the emacs and on the python list
Just excerpting from
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/acb0f2a01fe50151#
I am using python-mode to
[OT for this discussion but just wondering if Jambunathan's suggestions may
work here]
There has been this question asked both on the emacs and on the python list
Just excerpting from
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/acb0f2a01fe50151#
I am using python-mode to
Hello,
Nick Dokos writes:
> Yes, you can indeed - except for the [-] which is hardcoded. Try the
> following:
>
> #LATEX_HEADER: \setbox0=\hbox{\large$\square$}
>
> #+BIND: org-export-latex-list-parameters (:cbon
> "[{\\parbox[][][c]{\\wd0}{\\large$\\boxtimes$}}]" :cboff
> "[{\\parbox[][][c]{\
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
> > Yes, you can indeed - except for the [-] which is hardcoded. Try the
> > following:
> >
> > #LATEX_HEADER: \setbox0=\hbox{\large$\square$}
> >
> > #+BIND: org-export-latex-list-parameters (:cbon
> > "[{\\parbox[][][c]{\\wd0}{\\large
Hi Eric and Neeum,
Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Overwriting is still not supported, but I don't know if that's all that
>> important (I don't have an immediate need for it). And noweb by default
>> did not have it either, so perhaps it's not needed for most tasks
>
> This was my thinking.
>
>> (OTOH, yo
21 matches
Mail list logo
