Re: [Orgmode] org-mediawiki

Hi, On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Nagarjuna G wrote: > I thought of trying this extension done by Bastien.  I get the error > > > Symbol's function definition is void: org-export-handle-include-files-recurse > > I am loading the two files org-mediawiki.el and org-export.el from a > directory i

[Orgmode] org-mediawiki

I thought of trying this extension done by Bastien. I get the error Symbol's function definition is void: org-export-handle-include-files-recurse I am loading the two files org-mediawiki.el and org-export.el from a directory in my homes. Am I doing anything wrong? -- GN __

Re: [Orgmode] Bug report: filing into a date tree in year 2011 when 2010 exists in file

Hi Charles, On Dec 31, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Charles Cave wrote: Happy New Year! This morning I filed a note into my taskdiary file which is a date tree file. The top level headlines are: * Configuration * Calendar * 2010 When I filed a new note (date is 1st January 2011) I expected a new top

[Orgmode] Re: Installing org-mode from git without byte-compiling

> Inspecting the Makefile, I see that I probably want to make the info > documentation and have that installed automatically, I just don't want > to byte-compile the lisp. $ make doc/org The above command will create a file named 'org' in the doc directory. Once this is done alter `Info-directo

[Orgmode] Bug report: filing into a date tree in year 2011 when 2010 exists in file

Happy New Year! This morning I filed a note into my taskdiary file which is a date tree file. The top level headlines are: * Configuration * Calendar * 2010 When I filed a new note (date is 1st January 2011) I expected a new top level heading of * 2011 to be created but it wasn't. Instead, the

[Orgmode] Re: Installing org-mode from git without byte-compiling

Jeff Horn writes: > Bernt, Eric Schulte, and others, > > Bernt recently mentioned to me on #org-mode that he doesn't > byte-compile org-mode, which makes it much easier to read backtraces. > I'm trying to use Eric Schulte's starter-kit fork, and the > instructions suggest compiling org-mode.[1] >

[Orgmode] Re: Unintended behavior? Links without description

Aloha Christian, I explored the possibility of bisecting but found two things: 1) with my setup I can't run versions of Org-mode earlier than approximately 7.01h because of requirements for ob.el, and 2) the current behavior has been around at least since last summer--Org-mode version 7.01t

[Orgmode] Installing org-mode from git without byte-compiling

Bernt, Eric Schulte, and others, Bernt recently mentioned to me on #org-mode that he doesn't byte-compile org-mode, which makes it much easier to read backtraces. I'm trying to use Eric Schulte's starter-kit fork, and the instructions suggest compiling org-mode.[1] Inspecting the Makefile, I see

Re: [Orgmode] Convert iCalendar files to org files

On 30 Dec 2010, MidLifeXis at PerlMonks wrote: > Just as a possibility, what about using the diary syntax for dates in this > case? I have successfully done repeating tasks from $STARTDATE to $ENDDATE > using something like: > > %%(and (diary-block ...) (diary-cyclic ...)) Hi Brian, thank yo

[Orgmode] Re: How to match tags when no tag present

Nick Dokos writes: > Jeff Horn wrote: >> >> -{.}/! >> > >> > That indeed does the trick. Thanks, Carsten. A few questions, if you >> > have a moment: >> > >> > 1) What does "/!" do above? >> > 2) Can we insert anything (property matches, TODO keyword matches, >> > c.f. [[info:org:Matching%20tag

[Orgmode] return link to :file when using #+call

Hello all, Please could someone show me how to get an org link to the file in the results when using #+call with an R source block? This is the test I am using: #+source: foo() #+begin_src R :file bar.png plot(1,1) #+end_src #+results: foo() [[file:bar.png]] ( so that works fine ) #+call: foo[