Most of my tasks have only one state change (TODO->DONE), so I like to
be able to quickly see my log notes by fully expanding all headings in a
sub-tree. Thus, I do NOT use the LOGBOOK property.
However, for repeating items the list of log entries can get quite long.
If I fully expand a sub-
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
> Tom Tobin writes:
>> Hmm ... C-c ' now works only if the block is flush with the left
>> margin. Is this intentional?
>
> Yes, it's intentional. The # has to be the first character on the
> line. It's the same with the other org syntax which
Tom Tobin writes:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
>> Tom Tobin writes:
>>> I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
>>> seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
>>> "C-c i":
>>
>> C-c i is undefined with my setup.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On May 15, 2009, at 11:33 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I'd like to do a little modification to the code that grabs the
>> summary of items for the agenda view. For each item that has a
>> pare
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
> Tom Tobin writes:
>> I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
>> seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
>> "C-c i":
>
> C-c i is undefined with my setup. Did you mean C-c '?
Yeah, s
Hi Tom,
Tom Tobin writes:
> I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
> seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
> "C-c i":
C-c i is undefined with my setup. Did you mean C-c '?
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC html-mode
> foobar
> #+END_SRC
I think yo
* On Sat 05:39PM +, 16 May 2009, Carsten Dominik
(carsten.domi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Hsiu-Khuern,
>
> On May 15, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>
> Hi Carsten,
>
> You recently changed org-edit-src-code to use a separate buffer instead of an
> indirect buffer. One side effec
I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
"C-c i":
#+BEGIN_SRC html-mode
foobar
#+END_SRC
Am I missing something? The "short" form for code literals
(prepending a line with colon-space) seems to wo
I had the idea of using CATEGORY as a keyword.
Benefit:
using #+CATEGORY (or the CATEGORY property)
has the disadvantage that if I change the headline the category does not
update:
example:
Org-file:
* PROJECT *my_renamed_project1*
:PROPERTIES:
:CATEGORY: *myproject1*
:END:
** TODO clean g
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 00:16, Samuel Wales wrote:
> No, just a workaround of inserting both the parent and the child and
> letting the dots tell you the relationship between them.
>
How?
I would have to show all Project headlines in order to make this work...
However, I only want the parent of m
No, just a workaround of inserting both the parent and the child and
letting the dots tell you the relationship between them.
But perhaps I am not following the thread closely enough.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 15:01, Eraldo Helal wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 18:21, Samuel Wales wrote:
>>
>> I
Hi,
Forgive me if there is an obvious way to do this that I haven't found.
Is there an easy way to calculate the total number of tasks for a
file or a subtree?
For example, if the checkbox/todo progress cookie would calculate the
number of checkboxes/todos recursively for a subtree.
so that thi
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 18:21, Samuel Wales wrote:
> I recall that there was a variable that controls whether dots get put
> into the agenda line to show that it is a child of the previous agenda
> line, or something like that.
>
> Might possibly work if you include the parent?
I remember having
I think that typically you load a library, then run a function to add
stuff to hooks. That way, loading the library does not have
side-effects. Some packages use the term "insinuate".
I'd opt for a default of always encrypting when saving and only
decrypting when manually done. Maybe a little n
> I'd like to find out how people feel about that. Should org-crypt
> attach itself to org-mode-hook so that it can decrypt encrypted entries
> after you open an org file? At first I thought yes, but now I'm leaning
> towards no, you should decrypt entries manually as needed.
Yes, manually sound
Dear Sebastian,
On 18.05.2009, at 14:33, Sebastian Rose wrote:
You might want to take a look into the stylesheets on orgmode.org:
http://orgmode.org/org.css
and
http://orgmode.org/worg/worg.css
Depending on the tools you use on your site, modifiing the files on
the
fly (on output, maybe
Almost every time I click on a link, it inserts a return. I then have
to do org-reload, and it works for a bit. Then the next time I need
to follow a link (with intervening commands) it doesn't work.
Hints on how to provide information (post-command-hook?) to ease
debugging would be appreciated.
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On May 18, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
>>> I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
>>> motivation for doing something like this. If you are editing the
>
===
#this is a comment because of a vague recollection that the
#first line isn't supposed to be a headline. has that been
#fixed?
* this is a headline with a link. [[http://google.com][a search engine]]
this is body text. i put point on the headline at bol, then
do c-spc c-spc down down down d
Sorry for the delays in getting this posted, I've been doing a lot of
traveling lately.
The attached version of org-crypt fixes a few bugs and is just about
ready to be included in org proper. The only thing it might need before
inclusion in org is automatic encryption via hooks.
I'd like to fin
On May 18, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
motivation for doing something like this. If you are editing the
code in
the *Org Edit Src* buffer,
I recall that there was a variable that controls whether dots get put
into the agenda line to show that it is a child of the previous agenda
line, or something like that.
Might possibly work if you include the parent?
What was the name of that variable anyway?
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 19:07, Matt
The follow-mode works fine, and this is what I use currently, but usually
the item doesn't have data that tells clearly what it's parent item is. It'd
be nice to have this overview, in the flat form -- like Eraldo said, if
you'd like to print or just have a 10.000 feet view of the actions.
I'm not
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On May 14, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Dale Smith wrote:
>
> I'm confused about the value of FORMAT in {{{date(FORMAT)}}}.
>
> I wanted to use "%B %e, %Y", but I have two problems. With the
> quotes, I get an "eval: End of file during parsing" message. Without
> the quo
Hi Tennis,
On May 17, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Tennis Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie user of org-mode, and it looks very promising.
However, there are several key combinations that I have to change if
I'm going to use it. I use the combinations C-tab for iswitchb,
You could free up C-tab by cu
Thanks for the example.
I've added it along with a line crediting you as the author to the
org-exp-blocks page on worg.
Cheers -- Eric
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a simple asymptote block :
>
> #+begin_asy out.pdf
> import graph;
>
> size(0,4cm);
>
> real f(real t) {return 1+c
Ian Barton writes:
[...]
>>> Meanwhile have another problem:) When I try to view a page I can see
>>> the basic navigation structure, but no style info or content. I notice
>>> that there is no stylesheet.css in ~/blogs and I tried copying one
>>> from the blorgit directory there. I do have an
this is a test, please ignore
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
You might want to take a look into the stylesheets on orgmode.org:
http://orgmode.org/org.css
and
http://orgmode.org/worg/worg.css
Depending on the tools you use on your site, modifiing the files on the
fly (on output, maybe cached) might be a good solution too (DOM or XML
parser). You might
On May 18, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Stefan Vollmar wrote:
Hallo,
I am new to this list and apologize if this has been asked before.
Before I forget: many thanks for this EXCELLENT package!
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac
system. At least I think I have installed th
Ian Barton wrote:
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac system.
At least I think I have installed that version correctly (Aquamacs 1.7
uses an older version of org-mode) - how can I find out which version
I am really using?
org/Documentation/Show version in an org buf
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac system. At
least I think I have installed that version correctly (Aquamacs 1.7 uses
an older version of org-mode) - how can I find out which version I am
really using?
org/Documentation/Show version in an org buffer, or M-x orgvers
Hello,
Here is a simple asymptote block :
#+begin_asy out.pdf
import graph;
size(0,4cm);
real f(real t) {return 1+cos(t);}
path g=polargraph(f,0,2pi,operator ..)--cycle;
filldraw(g,pink);
xaxis("$x$",above=true);
yaxis("$y$",above=true);
dot("$(a,0)$",(1,0),N);
dot("$(2a,0)$",(2,0),N+E);
#+e
Hallo,
I am new to this list and apologize if this has been asked before.
Before I forget: many thanks for this EXCELLENT package!
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac system.
At least I think I have installed that version correctly (Aquamacs 1.7
uses an older ver
On May 17, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Following on from this, I'd like to suggest that, while it is being
edited, the source code is removed from the org buffer, to avoid
concurrency problems. I just had a go at that -- the patch below
replaces the source code with a work-in-progress
On May 18, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
motivation for doing something like this. If you are editing the
code in
the *Org Edit Src* buffer,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:07, Matthew Lundin wrote:
> In my opinion, the easiest way to figure out which project a TODO
> belongs to is to use follow mode in the agenda. That way you can see the
> original context (i.e., project) to which a todo belongs.
>
This works great for working with the
Can you please send me the exact buffer you are using, the exact range
that is covered by the active region, and the command you then use?
So far I have not been abe to reproduce what you are saying.
- Carsten
On May 18, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
The bug occurs when the region
38 matches
Mail list logo
