On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Andreas Burtzlaff wrote:
Hello Alan,
I think you overlooked one aspect of org-fstree.
If you place a link to a file in the org file (outside the region
between BEGIN_FSTREE and END_FSTREE), e.g:
* Some note [[file:foobar][foobar]] :someTag:
then this heading
Rustom Mody gmail.com> writes:
One of the cokments was that I had not supplied mystyles.css
You can download it from here:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~charles57/GTD/mystyles.css
Charles
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply A
Eraldo Helal writes:
>
> I believe the easiest way to do this is to type C-c p TAB. (C-c p
> moves
> to the next headline above the cursor.
>
> > Is there also a way to close the parent tree (if on one of its
> > contents)
> > e.g. close Projects tree while cursor
Samuel - Your solution is probably more elegant. Then I will wait for
search with lisp syntax functionality, and so far just use my code.
K
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
> Another possibility is to use your assoc tags and fix it on the search
> side. If you always have a
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 00:41, Matthew Lundin wrote:
>
> Eraldo Helal writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:11, Deric Bytes
> > wrote:
> >
> > I know you can hide the current content when on the heading by
> > pressing TAB.
> >
> > Is there a way to do this when the cursor is withi
Hello Alan,
I think you overlooked one aspect of org-fstree.
If you place a link to a file in the org file (outside the region
between BEGIN_FSTREE and END_FSTREE), e.g:
* Some note [[file:foobar][foobar]] :someTag:
then this heading will show up behind the file in the fstree as a link
back
Eraldo Helal writes:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:11, Deric Bytes
> wrote:
>
> I know you can hide the current content when on the heading by
> pressing TAB.
>
> Is there a way to do this when the cursor is within the content of
> the heading.
>
> I have to admint, that I wa
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:11, Deric Bytes wrote:
> I know you can hide the current content when on the heading by pressing
> TAB.
>
> Is there a way to do this when the cursor is within the content of the
> heading.
I have to admint, that I was looking for this too. (There is just so much
new s
shaunalynn duffy writes:
> Bernt and Carsten,
>
> Thanks a bunch for checking! While checking my version of org-mode against a
> friend's I realized, while I had recently
> pulled, I hadn't re-made and re-made+installed the package. Once I did that,
> the problem was fixed. Feels a bit foolish
Another possibility is to use your assoc tags and fix it on the search
side. If you always have a custom search, you can use `( ... ,( ...
)) when you define it.
Then you only need one tag on each task. The advantage of this is
that if the associations change, you will not need to change the tag
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I ended up introducing a new operator "?" for this special purpose.
> So now, please filter
>
> C-c a t / N / + ?
>
> The comparing operators <, >, and = now all treat tasks without effort
> according to the setting in `org-sort-agenda-noeffort-means-high', as 0
> or 32
Peter Jones - thanks for the advise. Unfortunately it does not fit to
me, since I have my todo items in different files.
Eraldo - I was also thinking about this, but I thought that maybe
solution already exists...
Anyhow, for my it is fixed - I wrote a small package org-assoc-tags,
that allows to
Bernt and Carsten,
Thanks a bunch for checking! While checking my version of org-mode against a
friend's I realized, while I had recently pulled, I hadn't re-made and
re-made+installed the package. Once I did that, the problem was fixed. Feels
a bit foolish but, again, I appreciate the help!
all
I know you can hide the current content when on the heading by pressing TAB.
Is there a way to do this when the cursor is within the content of the heading.
Can you close all other heading, whilst still keeping current heading
open and without moving the cursor
_
El dl, mar 30 2009, Carsten Dominik va escriure:
> I simply cannot believe that after all those years, we might be
> able to close this task.
Wow, that's wonderful! Thanks for a so easy solution.
I was needing this functionality since a long time.
About org-inlinetask-export:
,
| Do
Hi
org-reload needs 'find-library-name', which is missing on XEmacs v21.5
at least. However there is 'find-library' which can be coerced into
providing the filename:
;; hack - XEmacs does not have find-library-name, needed by org-reload.
(when (not (fboundp 'find-library-name))
(requir
Bill White wrote:
>
> Before I update from git (or whatever the terminology is - I'm a cvs
> guy), could I persuade you to apply Nick Dokos' patch to org-exp.el?
> His patch is in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/11862, and
> the problem it solves is described in my initial message i
Hi Bill,
I did apply Nick's patch on March 5,
commit 6ccc6b46528ad70f2f3267a7e40c70494f5c2192
If you are not comfortable with git, you can always get the
most recent snapshot at
http://orgmode.org/org-snapshot.zip
or
http://orgmode.org/org-snapshot.tar.gz
HTH
- Carsten
On Mar 31, 200
Hi Karl,
thanks for checking this out. Yes, I left a stupid bug
which did not show with my more complex test case.
This is fixed now.
About the .elc file, yes, another omission on my side, but
you could have run it anyway.
- Carsten
On Mar 31, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Karl Maihofer wrote:
Hi Carst
On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
List of all TODO entries (excluding dated items)
/ Limit to NEXT tagged
On Tue Mar 31 2009 at 09:36, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Bill White wrote:
>
>> On Mon Mar 30 2009 at 23:44, Matthew Lundin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> If I understand your post correctly, I think this section of the
>>> manual
>>> will help to accomplish what you ar
Applied, thanks.
- Carsten
P.S. If you know how to fix the context menus,
be my guest. :-)
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Tony E. Bennett wrote:
XEmacs complains about a few define-key sequences in org-mouse.el.
For example:
(define-key org-agenda-keymap [C-mouse-4] 'org-agenda-earlier
writes:
> Hi,
>is there any way to shift cells up/down within a column while leaving
>remaining columns intact. If not could someone point me in the right
>direction to any org-functions I could use to help me implement this?
You can move whole columns and rows around with \M(meta) +
Hi Carsten!
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
> I just pushed this file into the git repository. Read the file
> commentary for explanations and try it out - I think the
> mechanism work surprisingly well.
Thanks a lot! That seems to be what i was looking for. I just tried the
latest git-version and have
On Mar 31, 2009, at 1:53 PM, David Engster wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:03 PM, David Engster wrote:
While browsing through chapter 10, I got the impression that the
different views are just different filters, but that I'm always
dealing with the same agenda mode, whe
On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Bill White wrote:
On Mon Mar 30 2009 at 23:44, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Hi Bill,
If I understand your post correctly, I think this section of the
manual
will help to accomplish what you are looking for---i.e., the
creation of
special vertical lines in tables:
Hi,
is there any way to shift cells up/down within a column while leaving
remaining columns intact. If not could someone point me in the right
direction to any org-functions I could use to help me implement this?
--
aleblanc
___
Emacs-orgmod
On Mon Mar 30 2009 at 23:44, Matthew Lundin wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> If I understand your post correctly, I think this section of the manual
> will help to accomplish what you are looking for---i.e., the creation of
> special vertical lines in tables:
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Column-groups.htm
Hello,
I'm a beginners in org mode. I would like say that org mode is very nice
for me because I'm blind so outline mode is very useful for navigation
etc...
I'm not sure if my question is answered in org documentation but I don't
find what I need.
I use Clocking work time function for a loggi
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> List of all TODO entries (excluding dated items)
>> / Limit to NEXT tagged tasks
>>/ / Limit t
On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
I was looking for a way to select tasks with no effort so I could
define
an effort before working on them.
I'd like to retain the ability to find tasks with no effort
I actually created a .org file that represents the fields of an ICS-213
communication form a while back. It's wonderful to use that way except
that there are certain fields that would be nice if the TAB key would
actually advance to the next table instead of adding a new row to the
current one.
I am trying to use Charles Cave's 'How I use Emacs and Org-mode to implement
GTD' as a starter for myself.
So I took his .emacs and am in the process of making it my (org part of)
emacs setup
I found that some parts are relevant to org and some not.
So Ive split it into two files ccorg.el and other
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>> I was looking for a way to select tasks with no effort so I could
>> define
>> an effort before working on them.
>>
>> I'd like to retain the ability to find tasks with no effort easily.
>> There's probably a better
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:03 PM, David Engster wrote:
>> While browsing through chapter 10, I got the impression that the
>> different views are just different filters, but that I'm always
>> dealing with the same agenda mode, where each entry carries the same
>> information
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
I think I changed that behaviour originally in commit dc43885
I was looking for a way to select tasks with no effort so I could
define
an effort before working on them.
I'd like to retain the ability to find tasks with no effort easily.
The
This was part of James TD Smith's plans to rewrite the org/remember
code.
However, I have not heard from James about this in a long time.
James, are you still planning to do this?
- Carsten
On Mar 31, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Alan E. Davis wrote:
I have about used up all the letters in the alphabe
Together with the ability to limit the recursions, this is potentially
useful. Thank you.
A longstanding item on my wishlist has been a Linux implementation of
an old MSDOG workalike, 4DOS with the 4dos shell. That shell worked
alot like "dir" but it kept a field for comments. So, with those
us
38 matches
Mail list logo
