Hi, me again.
Wanted to ask, if the following behavior is wanted and if it could be
changed. I am speaking about this...
* Header 1 [0/1]
- [-] Item 1 [1/2]
- [X] Item 2
- [ ] Item 3
... compared to this ...
* Header 1 [/]
** Header 2 [1/2]
- [X] Item 1
- [ ] Item 2
I un
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, , Joel J. Adamson!
Hello, are you just being friendly or do we know each other IRL?
Joel
--
Joel J. Adamson
Biostatistician
Pediatric Psychopharmacology Research Unit
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, MA 02114
(617) 643-1432
(303) 880
#x27;m still a rookie with org mode (still
wet behind the ears) and maybe there are better approaches to
this. :-)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode/attachments/20080410/156bb882/attachment.html
Hello, , Joel J. Adamson!
Jose Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joel J. Adamson wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Jose, Manish
>>>
>>> I don't really think that it would be reasonable to make any entry
>>> that contains a string that looks like a time show
Joel J. Adamson wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jose, Manish
I don't really think that it would be reasonable to make any entry
that contains a string that looks like a time show up in the agenda.
I think I missed part of this conversation. If I put
** Wash
Thats great! I'll give it a try.
You got the right idea, its not the kind of thing you want to always
see. But when you consistently timestamp items, its potentially useful.
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:56:59PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Russel, I took another look, and it turned o
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jose, Manish
>
> I don't really think that it would be reasonable to make any entry
> that contains a string that looks like a time show up in the agenda.
I think I missed part of this conversation. If I put
** Wash the dog <2008-04-10 09:56 >
i
Jose Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Jose Robins wrote:
>
> Thanks Manish for the response. I didn't realize I had to "schedule"
> it as well. Now it works...
>
> Well, how else should the agenda know on which date
Hi Russel, I took another look, and it turned out to be a lot simpler
than I
had thought.
What you can do now (latest git push), in both agenda and timeline:
- press "l" to get CLOCK and CLOSED timestamps listed (this is not new)
- press "[" to get any other entries related to inactive timest
On Mar 21, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
I routinely use inactive timestamps during long tasks to document when
items occurred. I use inactive timestamps because I don't want to
litter my agenda view during normal use.
However I recently discovered the agenda timeline view, which is a
Hi Jose, Manish
I don't really think that it would be reasonable to make any entry
that contains a string that looks like a time show up in the agenda.
A fast way to add agenda item for the day is to use the Emacs
diary. In the agenda buffer, you can press "i d" to add a quick entry
to the diary
11 matches
Mail list logo
