[Orgmode] Re: Does org-agenda modify org file?

2008-04-04 Thread DigitalPig
William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It does not for me, se we need more info like version numbers of Emacs >> and Org, >> a backtrace would be nice, etc. > > I don't get a backtrace, only: > > ,[ *Message* ] > | Debug on Error enabled glob

[Orgmode] Mileage

2008-04-04 Thread Russell Adams
So I discussed this briefly on IRC, but how are others handling mileage reporting? Its very similar to clocking time, and fits neatly into the property drawer. Here's a sample of what I started, I'm just concerned about how to get the delta and a summary. ** DONE Meeting Downtown CLOSED: [2008

Re: [Orgmode] opinion+suggestions: Check boxes on headlines and cookies to take care of this into account...

2008-04-04 Thread Jose Robins
Sebastian Rose wrote: Yes, sorry - was just trying this on in exactly this moment :-/ The clocking works too, but then the TODO - STARTED - DONE is added automatically. Sorry Sebastian, did not exactly catch your point about "clocking works too". For me, if I try to clock in/out on a regular

Re: [Orgmode] opinion+suggestions: Check boxes on headlines and cookies to take care of this into account...

2008-04-04 Thread Sebastian Rose
Oh gosh - sorry, still missed your point. You're looking for: * [80%] something + [ ] asdfsdf + [X] sdafasd + [X] lökjlöjk *** [100%] asfjlöjklsadf + [X] sadfdsaf + [X] lökjlöl Would be nice indeed. Regards -- Sebastian Rose, Hanover, Germany Phone: +49 173 83 93 417 Mail.:

Re: [Orgmode] opinion+suggestions: Check boxes on headlines and cookies to take care of this into account...

2008-04-04 Thread Sebastian Rose
Yes, sorry - was just trying this on in exactly this moment :-/ The clocking works too, but then the TODO - STARTED - DONE is added automatically. But this one could be corrected by using the hook org-after-todo-state-change-hook. Some (not very elegant) function like (defun my-delete-todo-keywo

Re: [Orgmode] opinion+suggestions: Check boxes on headlines and cookies to take care of this into account...

2008-04-04 Thread Jose Robins
Jose Robins wrote: I like working with checkboxes, more than with headlines with a TODO keyword. Unfortunately, right now checkboxes are lightweight and so do not enjoy all the privileges enjoyed by headlines - especially clocking in and out (which is very important for me). I wish that re

[Orgmode] opinion+suggestions: Check boxes on headlines and cookies to take care of this into account...

2008-04-04 Thread Jose Robins
I like working with checkboxes, more than with headlines with a TODO keyword. Unfortunately, right now checkboxes are lightweight and so do not enjoy all the privileges enjoyed by headlines - especially clocking in and out (which is very important for me). I wish that regular checkboxes were

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
:-) Prety good, but it does have a minor flaw, the line with several tags is emitted as ** TODO Task 2 :@work: :@boss: But I am sure this can be fixes within the N=9 envelope. - Carsten On Apr 4, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Egli Christian (KIRO 433) wrote: Anyone wants to take up the challenge?

RE: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-04 Thread Egli Christian (KIRO 433)
> Anyone wants to take up the challenge? What N can be achieved? Haha, it's Friday afternoon and I decided to take the challenge. I implemented a very simplistic and stupid translator which is quite small but just barely manages to pass the test. It does so with 480 bytes which makes for N = 9 (

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Using column view on a sparse tree displaying only a few tags.

2008-04-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 3, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Jose Robins wrote: Thanks Bernt, that works! However the only thing is that I've defined COLUMNS for the whole file using the #+COLUMNS keyword at the top of the file. I guess those properties are not being considered in the column view on the agenda buffer. I

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-04 Thread Bastien
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For example, you *might* be able to convince your mum to use Taskpaper > but there's no way she'd ever use Emacs and Org-mode. I'd prefer my mum not to use or send me todo-lists! Even with a Org syntax. I'd been 20 years now that I try to convince her

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote: I'm not convinced of it's worth either. But having more org files out in the wild would be nice :-) It's a shame Taskpaper doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax really. R. Well, indeed not exactly the same, but very close. A way to

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real

2008-04-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 3, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Manish wrote: Not worth it, IMHO. Thank $deity, Carsten and others that contribute to org-mode do not /have to/ do it. I wish they would spend their time having fun instead of worrying about increasing market share. I am certainly doing exactly that. - Carsten