On 2007-08-27 19:19 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> For those of you who don't feel comfortable with GTD as the
> mind set for your task management system, here is an interesting,
> detailed, and really well written document describing a more
> traditional day planner setup.
>
> http://johnwieg
On Aug 27, 2007, at 18:33, J. David Boyd wrote:
Hmm, I do see this when I do a Ctl-h k on the key:
runs the command org-cycle
which is an interactive Lisp function in
`/home/Dave/.emacs.d/org-5.06/org.el'.
It is bound to , TAB, ,
. (org-cycle &optional arg)
Visibility cycling for
On 8/27/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those of you who don't feel comfortable with GTD as the
> mind set for your task management system,
that sure sounds like me!
> here is an interesting,
> detailed, and really well written document describing a more
> traditional day pla
For those of you who don't feel comfortable with GTD as the
mind set for your task management system, here is an interesting,
detailed, and really well written document describing a more
traditional day planner setup.
http://johnwiegley.com/org.mode.day.planner.html
It is written by John Wie
Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2007-08-27 15:01 +0100, J. David Boyd wrote:
>> I used to be able to open an org file, and with the cursor in the top left
>> hand corner of the file, where it defaults to, press repeatedly to
>> cycle
>> through showing the different levels of my file.
>
> S
On 2007-08-27 15:01 +0100, J. David Boyd wrote:
> I used to be able to open an org file, and with the cursor in the top left
> hand corner of the file, where it defaults to, press repeatedly to cycle
> through showing the different levels of my file.
See the ChangeLog on org mode page. I remember
I used to be able to open an org file, and with the cursor in the top left
hand corner of the file, where it defaults to, press repeatedly to cycle
through showing the different levels of my file.
Now, I have to be on a top level heading to cycle through the values under it.
Did I miss a new v
Bernt Hansen schrieb:
Rainer Stengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I wonder what is the best way to work with fixed dates in org.
I do not want to them entered as "SCHEDULED".
Say I have a meeting on a certain date.
I do not want to enter it as a todo, as for me it is not really a todo
but a si
