This should work out of the box and usually does.
What exactly does your entry look like?
- Carsten
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:52, Michael wrote:
Right now the agenda view looks like:
Wednesday 13 June 2007
Work:15:30-17:00 Meeting <2007-06-13 Wed >
I would think the time stamp between <>
Fixed, thanks, in particular for the full analysis of this bug.
- Carsten
On Jun 14, 2007, at 23:15, Jonathan Moore wrote:
I am getting an error "Specified time is not representable" when
calling
org-timeline. The backtrace looks like:
encode-time(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
apply(encode-time
On Jun 7, 2007, at 16:15, Fabian Braennstroem wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use org-mode's ability for outlining and syntax
highlighting for some scheme batch files.
The file looks like this:
It does not sound promising to me to use org-mode for
syntax highlighting in some other file. Much bet
Hi Patrick,
thank you for the very clear description, this makes it fast
to find and resolve a bug. This one will be fixed in the
next version.
- Carsten
On Jun 15, 2007, at 6:09, Patrick Drechsler wrote:
Hi,
there is a small display bug in the clock-out feature when the start
time was chan
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:02, pete phillips wrote:
"John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
Jo
On Jun 14, 2007, at 18:34, William Henney wrote:
Here is another one!
* indentation problem following a TBLFM line
| foo |
|-|
| 1 |
#+TBLFM: $1=$1
Hitting TAB on this line does not indent correctly.
---
On Jun 13, 2007, at 23:58, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
On 6/13/07, Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm planning ahead on some items, and having a way to represent the
amount of time a TODO item will take
On a similar note, I like using the clocktable to see how long things
have taken me
Hi,
there is a small display bug in the clock-out feature when the start
time was changed manually. To reproduce:
1. Open a new org file: `C-x C-f a.org'
2. Enter a minimal text:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* foo
some text
--8<---cut here-
Just forwarding to the list. I forgot to.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eddward DeVilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 13, 2007 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Duration Tally
To: Scott Jaderholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 6/13/07, Scott Jaderholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/13/0
I am getting an error "Specified time is not representable" when calling
org-timeline. The backtrace looks like:
encode-time(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
apply(encode-time (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0))
org-time-string-to-time(#("2007-05-10" 0 10 (fontified t mouse-face highlight
rear-nonsticky t keymap (keym
Here is another one!
* indentation problem following a TBLFM line
| foo |
|-|
| 1 |
#+TBLFM: $1=$1
Hitting TAB on this line does not indent correctly.
Cheers
Will
--
Dr William
Right now the agenda view looks like:
Wednesday 13 June 2007
Work:15:30-17:00 Meeting <2007-06-13 Wed >
I would think the time stamp between <> is redundant. Can we remove it from
display in the agenda buffer? It makes long text entry look nicer.
Michael
__
On 6/14/07, Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pete phillips wrote:
>> "John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
> >> want to move
pete phillips wrote:
"John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
>> want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
>>
John> I agr
> "John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
>> want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
>>
John> I agree with Leo -- or,
On 6/14/07, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
> *** headline
> - item 1
> - item 2
> here we have some text
> - item 3
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be
> - Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
>
> > *** headline
> > - item 1
> > - item 2
> > here we have some text
> > - item 3
In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
> to move the it
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
> *** headline
> - item 1
> - item 2
> here we have some text
> - item 3
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
--
Leo (GPG
On Jun 12, 2007, at 19:36, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
I hit this a bit, but I'm pretty quick with C-S-_. Likewise I use
M-return and M-S-return pretty religiously now. My problem is that
M-right will insert spaces into the following line when it is blank.
I keep having to clear the following line
On Jun 12, 2007, at 19:18, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
I must admit I do run into this on occasion and
"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>We already have SCHEDULED, DEADLINE, & CLOSED that are meaningful
> to org-mode.
And CLOCK, as well.
--
+---+
| Jason F. McBrayer[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| If someone conqu
21 matches
Mail list logo
