Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jun 9, 2007, at 8:50, Maxim Loginov wrote:
>
>> it would be good if sparse tree created by C-u C-c C-v take
>> not a numerical argument, but string from org-todo-keywords
>> with auto completion.
>
> This is exactly how it works. Have you actually
Leo gmail.com> writes:
>
> - Carsten Dominik (2007-06-12) wrote:-
>
> >> *** heading 1
> >> - item 1
> >> - item 2
> >>
> >> Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
> >>
> >> *** heading 1
> >> - item 1
> >> - item 2
> >
> > The question I have is: why would you pr
I like that alot!
However my goal was one of simple project planning.
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:33:48AM -0500, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>I'm starting to wonder if it would be useful to have a general
> format for properties (or choose some other word) to be associated
> with a heading
On 6/13/07, Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm planning ahead on some items, and having a way to represent the
amount of time a TODO item will take
On a similar note, I like using the clocktable to see how long things
have taken me, but sometimes I just want to put a time value under
Last week I posted something about the org-mode community sharing
usage strategies and configurations. My thoughts on this issue
eventually turned into a blog post.
http://dto.freeshell.org/blog/blog-2007-06-13-1355.html
I'm not sure whether we should start a new wiki, or just collaborate
on an
Bugfix release. Thank you Carsten!
http://dto.freeshell.org/notebook/org-blog.el
Org-blog is very simple and not very featureful right now. But I want
to develop it into a more comprehensive blogging tool. Feel free to
make suggestions!
--
David O'Toole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dto.freeshell.
I'm starting to wonder if it would be useful to have a general
format for properties (or choose some other word) to be associated
with a heading or todo item. It seems the heading is getting a little
crowded.
Would it be reasonable to say that a list of non-whitespace
listing following the
If this feature already exists, I've missed it...
I'm planning ahead on some items, and having a way to represent the
amount of time a TODO item will take, and then having the parent total
the duration of the children would be very helpful.
* TODO A {6h}
** TODO a1 {2h}
** TODO a2 {2h}
** TODO a3
