Re: [Emacs-orgmode] (another) org-blog

Hi Bastien, this seems to be interesting and full of features. thank you very much for writing in and making it available. One request: Please rename the file (or make David rename his). Right now it is not possible to have both even for testing purposes because the names are the same.

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs

Hi Bastien, On Jun 10, 2006, at 18:20, Bastien wrote: Trying to customize org-emphasis-alist to use strike-through fontification, i've been manually setting this: (setq org-emphasis-alist '(("*" bold "" "") ("/" italic "" "") ("_" underline "" "") ("=" shadow "" "") ("+" (:st

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FOr the coming release I have generalized the emphasis part very much > and allowed to configure the regular expression for emphasis matching. Works far better for me like this. I don't see any relevant improvement to org-emphasis-regexp-components.

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] org-publish v1.71

Tranforming the filenames/paths during publishing is a nontrivial problem. This would require changes to both org-publish and org itself. One way of solving it would be to pass an association list mapping input filenames to output filenames, this would let you bypass the normal :publishing-directo

[Emacs-orgmode] Org-mode version 4.37

Hi, I am releasing version 4.37 or Org-mode at http://www.astro.uva.nl/~dominik/Tools/org/ and through Emacs CVS. The new clock feature will work under XEmacs only if no text is hidden or if the port of noutline.el for XEmacs by Greg Chernev is used. This marks the beginning of the end of t

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs

On Jun 10, 2006, at 14:24, Bastien wrote: Hi Dominik and all, Thanks for org-mode. Here is a quite long list of possible bugs or strange behavior. * Fontification: a *bold* is not recognized as such when other than a space or a beginning-of-line char surrounds it. Hence "(*bold*)" or "*

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs

Hi Bastien, On Jun 10, 2006, at 14:24, Bastien wrote: Hi Dominik and all, (Carsten is my first name...) Thanks for this very useful list of bugs and other issues. I'll go through these for the next release. - Carsten Thanks for org-mode. Here is a quite long list of possible bugs or s

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] circufix notation for inline and styling

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> While I'm at it, is strike-through possible? >> >> -event- was canceled > > I think this one is a bit too likely to occur in a non-intended way, a > different syntax would be needed, and I am willing to implement it > (even though strike-through i

[Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs

Hi Dominik and all, Thanks for org-mode. Here is a quite long list of possible bugs or strange behavior. * Fontification: a *bold* is not recognized as such when other than a space or a beginning-of-line char surrounds it. Hence "(*bold*)" or "*bold*?" are not fontified. Additionnally: "

[Emacs-orgmode] (another) org-blog

Hi folks, here is another `org-blog' for org-mode : It provides one unique fonction : M-x org-blog-publish This takes an org-mode buffer and convert it into a blog. Note that only TODO-marked first level headings are converted into posts. For

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, this is certainly true. ascii-to-xxx converters can certainly >> help you to write your first LaTeX document. However, they don't >> encourage to grow into that language at all, so to some extend th

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] org-publish future ?

"Xavier Maillard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was looking on emacswiki searching for publish engines for > Emacs. Actually, I have found at least three of them: > > 1. muse > 2. emacs-wiki > 3. bhl Since you mentionned BHL, let me talk a bit about it. BHL is quite *old* and buggy - it was m