https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25509
Eli Schwartz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eschwartz at archlinux dot org
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: debuginfod
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: eschwartz at archlinux dot org
CC: elfutils-devel at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
When running debuginfod-find repeatedly against some
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25509
--- Comment #13 from Eli Schwartz ---
I think we'd prefer to have the ability to build libdebuginfod without the
server. Ambivalent about a special option to force the libdebuginfod dummy to
be created, but...
If it's just for testing purpose
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25509
--- Comment #15 from Eli Schwartz ---
Wouldn't that be covered by "libdebuginfod disabled equals dummy enabled"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25509
--- Comment #19 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Eli Schwartz from comment #13)
> I think we'd prefer to have the ability to build libdebuginfod without the
> server.
I believe you get that with --enable-libdebuginfod --disable-debuginfod,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25509
--- Comment #21 from Eli Schwartz ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #17)
> I admit that having the combination --enable-libdebuginfod=dummy and
> --enable-libdebuginfod is somewhat redundant/non-sensical, but it helps with
> (build t
