Re: debuginfod: curious case of libicudata.so

2021-04-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Frank, On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 07:17:48AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Yes, it doesn't contain any DWARF, which is why libdw doesn't like > > it. But it does contain a .symtab sections, so it is "debuginfo". > > Yeah. I'm about to commit the following patch for this. That looks like it

Re: debuginfod: curious case of libicudata.so

2021-04-15 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel
Hi - > Yes, it doesn't contain any DWARF, which is why libdw doesn't like > it. But it does contain a .symtab sections, so it is "debuginfo". Yeah. I'm about to commit the following patch for this. commit 1bcfab2af7e51980bdf46464bcbd367ca46aa771 Author: Frank Ch. Eigler Date: Thu Apr 15 04:

Re: debuginfod: curious case of libicudata.so

2021-04-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Frank, On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:30:59AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel wrote: > Just happened to come across some odd traffic in gdb/debuginfod > on the fedora servers. Wonder how common this case is. The > RPM in question is icu: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildi

debuginfod: curious case of libicudata.so

2021-04-15 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel
Hi - Just happened to come across some odd traffic in gdb/debuginfod on the fedora servers. Wonder how common this case is. The RPM in question is icu: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1555665 (f33; other versions the same) This builds into the usual binary / -debuginfo su