On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:16:11PM +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> And then there are nonstandard C constructs, especially void* arithmetics
void * arithmetic can at times be surprising, so that seems a fine cleanup.
Best to make sure the code compiles cleanly with -Wpointer-arith.
> and statement ex
> If at all possible I would like elfutils to not turn into some
> abstraction layer for broken non-GNU/Linux systems. I don't mind small
> (mostly) obvious correct defines/checks or tweaks to help out people
> using such broken systems. But if we need a lot more of these things I
> think we shoul
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 10:50 +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> True. With other missing functions I tend to conditionally build the
> replacements into libeu.a as actual functions. That requires libeu.a
> to be linked into libdw.so, libelf.so, etc. I will create a followup
> patch that does the same with
On 02/17/2017 10:46 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 10:10 +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote:
>> If it doesn't exist, provide a definition based on memcpy.
>
> Applied, but slightly reluctantly. I have no way to test this. And it
> will evaluate the last argument (n) twice. Which seems to n
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 10:10 +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> If it doesn't exist, provide a definition based on memcpy.
Applied, but slightly reluctantly. I have no way to test this. And it
will evaluate the last argument (n) twice. Which seems to not matter in
the current calls in our codebase. But it
