On 9/9/19 11:25 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> There is a testfile45.expect.bz2 that doesn't look like it is supposed
> to be part of the patch set. You probably don't want to commit that one.
Yes, I do. The x86-64 disassembler had a tiny whitespace bug exposed
through the code.
> There is a testcase
On 9/7/19 2:18 AM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
I'll check in the attached patch which implements a disassembler for
RISC-V. It also fixes a problem in the x86 disassember, exposed through
the additions needed for RISC-V.
Since aside rth, who added the BPF disassembler, no one beside me ever
worked on
Hi Ulrich,
On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 11:18:42AM +0200, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I'll check in the attached patch which implements a disassembler for
> RISC-V. It also fixes a problem in the x86 disassember, exposed through
> the additions needed for RISC-V.
This is awesome. Thanks.
> Since aside r
I'll check in the attached patch which implements a disassembler for
RISC-V. It also fixes a problem in the x86 disassember, exposed through
the additions needed for RISC-V.
Since aside rth, who added the BPF disassembler, no one beside me ever
worked on that code I will push the changes as soon
