Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add C-SKY support

2019-06-26 Thread Mao Han
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:26:55AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 14:41 +0800, Mao Han wrote: > > I'v just spent sometime debuging this. Core dump backtrace on C-SKY > > seems > > can't be supported with current generic routine. DWARF register order is > > different fr

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add C-SKY support

2019-06-24 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 14:41 +0800, Mao Han wrote: > I'v just spent sometime debuging this. Core dump backtrace on C-SKY > seems > can't be supported with current generic routine. DWARF register order is > different from the order in core notes. The initialization of frame > registers is totall

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add C-SKY support

2019-04-16 Thread Mao Han
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:23:49PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > It is hard to say what went wrong. > In theory you can examine the executable and core file cross arch, if > there is backend support. So if you could post a small binary and a > core file for it somewhere we can try debugging togethe

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add C-SKY support

2019-04-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 15:51 +0800, Mao Han wrote: > I'v check some of the failed testcase. Thanks for double checking, it seems we understand all of the cases why they fail except... > > I haven't looked at the code yet, so maybe none of the backtrace tests > > would work even if you could run in

[PATCH V2 0/2] Add C-SKY support

2019-04-10 Thread Mao Han
I'v check some of the failed testcase. > > FAIL: run-native-test.sh > > > > > > allregs: 23064: No such file or directory > > FAIL run-native-test.sh (exit status: 1) > > This is probably because of the script modifications. The test cannot > find the running process. >