On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 04:16:25PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi, Omar -
>
> Thanks. I wish this sort of amazing kludge weren't necessary, but
> given that it helps, so be it.
>
> I'd like to commend you on the effort needed to match your code up
> with the stylistic idiosyncracies of the
Hi, Omar -
Thanks. I wish this sort of amazing kludge weren't necessary, but
given that it helps, so be it.
I'd like to commend you on the effort needed to match your code up
with the stylistic idiosyncracies of the debuginfod c++ code. It
looks just like the other code. My only reservation is
From: Omar Sandoval
drgn [1] currently uses debuginfod with great success for debugging
userspace processes. However, for debugging the Linux kernel (drgn's
main use case), we have had some performance issues with debuginfod, so
we intentionally avoid using it. Specifically, it sometimes takes
