[...] How about the attached?
Looks good to me.
Ulf
ions->count
&& *addr == sections->refs[idx + 1].start)
++idx;
So we do indeed want the zero sized section to be the first.
How about the attached?
Cheers,
Mark
>From d7e1e08f68afd6c3363231e3100fa0124a2d5cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ulf Hermann
On 04/27/2017 09:41 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:54:26PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
>> At least one test (dwfl-addr-sect) depends on the order of elf sections
>> with equal addresses. This is not guaranteed by the code. Compare also
>> by end address and name to tell entries
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:54:26PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> At least one test (dwfl-addr-sect) depends on the order of elf sections
> with equal addresses. This is not guaranteed by the code. Compare also
> by end address and name to tell entries apart.
O, interesting find. If the start address
At least one test (dwfl-addr-sect) depends on the order of elf sections
with equal addresses. This is not guaranteed by the code. Compare also
by end address and name to tell entries apart.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hermann
---
libdwfl/ChangeLog | 5 +
libdwfl/derelocate.c| 17 ++
