https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
Aaron Merey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
--- Comment #5 from David Blaikie ---
Just a quick +1 to Comment #2 - consumers shouldn't rely on the presence of
.debug_aranges, or them being complete (DWARF doesn't require/guarantee this -
and Clang doesn't emit aranges by default, for ins
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
--- Comment #4 from Josh Stone ---
Here's my rustc PR to enable aranges by default:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66532
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
--- Comment #3 from Josh Stone ---
> I can talk to upstream about making that the default,
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45246
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
--- Comment #2 from Josh Stone ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> But if there are .debug_aranges then it seems bad to assume they
> are wrong or incomplete.
I think it's safe to trust that given aranges are valid, but not that
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
