https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
--- Comment #7 from Ross Burton ---
Looks good to me!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
--- Comment #6 from Frank Ch. Eigler ---
please check out commit 7399e3bd7eb72d045 on elfutils.git for a test patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
--- Comment #5 from Ross Burton ---
Yes.
My use case is a test that uses debuginfod, so it works everywhere and as it
only has to service a few requests I'm just passing -C2 -c2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
--- Comment #4 from Frank Ch. Eigler ---
I assume "debuginfod -C $num -d $num" still works for you, in this battle of
distro/site defaults.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
--- Comment #3 from Ross Burton ---
Yes, kernel defaults: 1024 soft, 4096 hard.
I *can* change it to 4096 but there's still the point that:
1) debugging the failure case isn't trivial
2) cores*2 threads in the connection pool probably doesn'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
--- Comment #2 from Ross Burton ---
Honestly, no idea. Appears to be the default on ubuntu.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29976
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment
