A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-fedora-s390x while building
elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/43/builds/367
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: f5d6e088f84dd05278c4698a21cbf1ff4569978d
Worker: fedora-s390x
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-debian-ppc64 while building
elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/63/builds/411
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: 5c3e02e5dc3dd46a07d5d9d148dcc8000191c834
Worker: debian-ppc64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32293
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Hi Aaron,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 09:19:26AM -0400, Aaron Merey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 7:48 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > The run-debuginfod-seekable.sh test would run (and fail) if lzma
> > support was enabled, but debuginfod wasn't build. Only run it when
> > both are available.
> >
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 18:36 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> When dependencies for libdebuginfod, debuginfod or ima verification are
> missing and these features are explicitly enabled the user might not
> immediately know which of the dependicies are missing. Move the checks
> around a little so chec
When dependencies for libdebuginfod, debuginfod or ima verification are
missing and these features are explicitly enabled the user might not
immediately know which of the dependicies are missing. Move the checks
around a little so checks for dependencies are done immediately before
the enable error
Hi Anton,
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 14:14 +0300, ant.v.morya...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: AntonMoryakov
>
> - Added a check to ensure `arhdr` is not NULL before using it in `strcmp` to
> avoid segmentation fault.
> - This resolves the issue where the pointer returned from `elf_getarhdr` may
> be NU
Hi Anton,
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 14:08 +0300, ant.v.morya...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: AntonMoryakov
>
> - Added a check to ensure `retval` is not NULL before using it in `strcmp` to
> prevent a segmentation fault.
> - This resolves the issue where `retval` could be NULL when passed to
> `strcmp
Hi Anton,
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 13:40 +0300, ant.v.morya...@gmail.com wrote:
> Fix a bug that caused a null pointer dereference in the `dwarf_ranges`
> function.
> Added a check for NULL before dereferencing the pointer `d` to prevent
> potential
> segmentation faults.
Basically the same commen
Hi Anton,
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 13:09 +0300, ant.v.morya...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: AntonMoryakov
>
> fix: fixed null pointer inference error in process_file function
>
> Fixed a bug that could cause the program to crash when processing files
> without a suffix.
Do you have a testcase for th
From: AntonMoryakov
- Added a check to ensure `arhdr` is not NULL before using it in `strcmp` to
avoid segmentation fault.
- This resolves the issue where the pointer returned from `elf_getarhdr` may be
NULL and causes a crash when dereferenced.
---
src/objdump.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 ins
From: AntonMoryakov
- Added a check to ensure `retval` is not NULL before using it in `strcmp` to
prevent a segmentation fault.
- This resolves the issue where `retval` could be NULL when passed to `strcmp`,
which could cause a crash.
---
libdwfl/dwfl_segment_report_module.c | 2 +-
1 file cha
From: AntonMoryakov
Fix a bug that caused a null pointer dereference in the `dwarf_ranges` function.
Added a check for NULL before dereferencing the pointer `d` to prevent potential
segmentation faults.
---
libdw/dwarf_ranges.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -
From: AntonMoryakov
fix: fixed null pointer inference error in process_file function
Fixed a bug that could cause the program to crash when processing files without
a suffix.
Added a NULL check for the suffix pointer before calling stpcpy().
---
src/elflint.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 ins
14 matches
Mail list logo