Hi Maks,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:53:03PM +0300, Maks Mishin wrote:
> Return value of a function 'elf_begin' is dereferenced at strip.c:1166
> without checking for NULL, but it is usually checked for this function.
Please stop sending these "patches" till you actually understand the
code.
In t
Return value of a function 'elf_begin' is dereferenced at strip.c:1166
without checking for NULL, but it is usually checked for this function.
Found by RASU JSC.
Signed-off-by: Maks Mishin
---
src/strip.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/strip.c b/src/s
On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 16:45:40 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Matheus,
>
> On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 16:56 -0300, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
> > BTW, just out of curiosity, since the last incident with xz's backdoor
> > (which apparently involved malicious code disguised as a test binary),
>
Hi Matheus,
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 16:56 -0300, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
> BTW, just out of curiosity, since the last incident with xz's backdoor
> (which apparently involved malicious code disguised as a test binary),
> has the elfutils community already considered using something like
>
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:51:22PM +0800, Ying Huang wrote:
> From: Ying Huang
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Huang
> ---
> backends/Makefile.am | 3 +-
> backends/mips_corenote.c | 85 +
> backends/mips_init.c | 3 +
> backends/mips_regs.c | 135 +
Hi Ying,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:51:21PM +0800, Ying Huang wrote:
> From: Ying Huang
>
> Add abi_cfi, set_initial_registers_tid, unwind on mips.
Sorry for reviewing out of order. But this one looked easy enough.
The new abi_cfi, unwind and set_initial_registers_tid implementations
looks corr