On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 11:58 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I don't know how people "scope" this. But it feels a little paranoid to
> restrict access to debuginfo and sources. So I wouldn't really mind
> other users also having access.
>
> You don't even need a real httpd proxy, you could even run a
Hi,
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 10:47 -0700, Daniel Thornburgh via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> >
> > I think this could work for a standalone program like debuginfod-find,
> > but not for a library like libdebuginfod. I would rather not have to
> > fork and exec from libdebuginfod.
> >
>
> Could this fu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29430
Matt Wozniski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
A restored build has been detected on builder elfutils-fedora-s390x while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/43/builds/45
Build state: build successful
Revision: 0873ae782d14e672e8344775e76b7fca0a8b41bf
Worker: fedora-s390x
Bui
Hi,
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 15:48 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> With GCC 12.1.1, glibc 2.3a, -fsanitize=undefined and
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 we get the following error message:
>
> In file included from /usr/include/ar.h:22,
> from ../libelf/libelfP.h:33,
> from cor
On 2022-07-28 13:27, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
Interesting, I'll take a closer look at this from the gcc context. I
obviously don't have any strong opinions about the elfutils patch :)
I reduced this to the below program and I see it warns with
`-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -O2 -fsanitize=undefined` a
Hi -
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] debuginfod: create indexes to speed up grooming
> Create indexes on _r_de and _f_de tables
> to speed up delete operations called by groom() function.
Pushed, thanks!
- FChE
>From 32bd2715e2490fe7a56794b78563c799d456f4be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Cejka
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:57:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] debuginfod: create indexes to speed up grooming
Create indexes on _r_de and _f_de tables
to speed up delete operations called by groom() function.
P
Re-pushed for fixing run-backtrace-core-sparc.sh failure which resulted
from some wrong register number.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 9:27 PM Di Chen wrote:
> Thanks for the review, Mark.
>
> Re-pushed a patch for it.
>
> 1. NEWS entry added.
> 2. __libdwfl_frame_reg_get/dwfl_frame_reg updated with r
Thanks for the review, Mark.
Re-pushed a patch for it.
1. NEWS entry added.
2. __libdwfl_frame_reg_get/dwfl_frame_reg updated with return int.
3. New DWFL_ERROR added: REGISTER_VAL_UNKNOWN.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:32 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:21:21PM +080
10 matches
Mail list logo