Re: tests/backtrace-dwarf.c failure due to -freorder-blocks-and-partition

2018-08-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 08/03/2018 11:46 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 09:41 +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> As slightly discussed with Mark, there are tests that expect 'main' >> will be present in backtrace. That's not always true on x86_64 >> because >> -freorder-blocks-and-partition

Re: tests/backtrace-dwarf.c failure due to -freorder-blocks-and-partition

2018-08-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Martin, On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 09:41 +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > As slightly discussed with Mark, there are tests that expect 'main' > will be present in backtrace. That's not always true on x86_64 > because > -freorder-blocks-and-partition option is on by default. Then one can > see: > > [   

tests/backtrace-dwarf.c failure due to -freorder-blocks-and-partition

2018-08-03 Thread Martin Liška
Hello. As slightly discussed with Mark, there are tests that expect 'main' will be present in backtrace. That's not always true on x86_64 because -freorder-blocks-and-partition option is on by default. Then one can see: [ 88s] FAIL: run-backtrace-dwarf.sh [ 88s] [