Ian Eslick wrote:
> One quick suggestion. Try doing an open-store with the :deadlock-detect nil
> keyword
> argument. I can't remember for sure whether that is dependent on 4.6 or 4.7
> but it's
> worth trying.
Default deadlock detection works with 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.
Leslie
_
; Call to (METHOD ELEPHANT::OPEN-CONTROLLER (DB-BDB::BDB-STORE-CONTROLLER))
> (offset 295)
>
> Call to CLOS::METHOD-COMBINATION-TEMPLATE (offset 62)
>
> Call to OPEN-STORE (offset 66)
>
> Call to EVAL (offset 113)
> EXP : (OPEN-STORE *DB-SPEC*)
>
> Call to EDITOR::EDITOR
?
Best regards,
Frank
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Ian Eslick"
> Gesendet: 11.01.10 00:16:56
> An: Elephant bugs and development
> Betreff: Re: [elephant-devel] upgrade from 0.9 to 1.0
> Priorität: Niedrig
> I know we have pre-build Elephant D
eads access
> the db.
> That is why I am using the postmodern backend. It is simple, stable and I
> don't have to care about performance.
> Still, I will try to get BDB up again and let you know.
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
&g
performance.
> Still, I will try to get BDB up again and let you know.
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: "Plamen ."
>> Gesendet: 05.01.10 16:56:55
>> An: Elephant bugs and development
>> Betreff: Re:
o get BDB up again and let you know.
Best regards,
Frank
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Plamen ."
> Gesendet: 05.01.10 16:56:55
> An: Elephant bugs and development
> Betreff: Re: [elephant-devel] upgrade from 0.9 to 1.0
> Hello Frank, if you get Elephant
0\src\db-bdb\libberkeley-db.o:libberkeley-db.c:(.text+0x489):
undefined reference to `_db_create'
c:\lisp\libraries\elephant-1.0\src\db-bdb\libberkeley-db.o:libberkeley-db.c:(.text+0xe88):
undefined reference to `_db_sequence_create'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I hope this can
Hello Frank, if you get Elephant & BDB running under LWW, I would be
interested in the result - see the LispWorks/Berkley post from last
month for details.
Regards
Plamen
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Ian Eslick wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Have you tested with BDB? I'm curious if it's a backend i
Hi Frank,
Have you tested with BDB? I'm curious if it's a backend issue (the serialized
byte-stream seems to be at fault; it's what's causing the condition to be
asserted which itself fails).
The other sanity check is to confirming no stale fasls and appropriate settings
in my-config.sexp
