Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-19 Thread Slobodan Blazeski
On 10/19/07, Slobodan Blazeski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/19/07, Ian Eslick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I just integrated, tested and pushed my local patches to the main 091 > > repository, including fixing all the bugs I found under Allegro due > > to missing t

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-19 Thread Ian Eslick
Hi All, I just integrated, tested and pushed my local patches to the main 091 repository, including fixing all the bugs I found under Allegro due to missing test dependencies. The data store and migration tests are green on: Mac OS X 32-bit / SBCL / BDB Mac OS X 32-bit / Allegro 8.0 / BD

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-19 Thread Ian Eslick
Ok, I've got a merged version of my 091 tree and the main 091 tree. I get two errors under SBCL, but about 30 under Allegro. Some of the changes on the main branch have seriously broken Allegro with BDB. I'm looking into this. Some of these errors may very well be related to the problems

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-18 Thread Ian Eslick
I've seen this one before. I haven't tested version 7 in some time, but I don't think that Allegro 8 changed the MOP at all. This error arises when a class object is operated on but no instance has been created so the class itself is not finalized. I added a function that uses the MOP to

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-08 Thread Slobodan Blazeski
I forget to mention, this is compiled with Allegro 7. Is version 7 still supported ? Slobodan On 10/8/07, Robert L. Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ian, you use Allegro, don't you? > > The failure below is the place to look. > > "is not yet finalized" sure sounds like a difference between li

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-08 Thread Robert L. Read
Ian, you use Allegro, don't you? The failure below is the place to look. "is not yet finalized" sure sounds like a difference between lisps or compiler switches in some way. On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 21:52 +0200, Slobodan Blazeski wrote: > > Failure Details: > >

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-08 Thread Slobodan Blazeski
Hi Henrik I've installed FiveAM and all the dependancies, found that I must download SLIME because it uses SWANK, and go through testing Postmodern backend with Allegro. I will test LW too and post the both logs tomorrow. Slobodan On 10/7/07, Henrik Hjelte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why can

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-07 Thread Robert L. Read
I'm afraid I don't personally have an LW system installed, nor do I have easy access to a windows machine. I don't think I will be able to help you, unless you can follow Henrik's suggestion and get the FiveAM, and therefore the test suite, working on your system. I think it important to support

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-07 Thread Henrik Hjelte
Why can't you install FiveAM under Windows, I think it should work. If you have problems, send a mail to the bese mailing list explaining which version you are running and a backtrace, then someone might help you (and other Windows users) Have you tried the darcs version? /Henrik Hjelte On 10/7

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-07 Thread Slobodan Blazeski
Hi Richard I tried postmodern backend and under Allegro everything seems fine, LW makes the same problem. I was unable to run tests since they depend on FiveAM which I'm unable to install under windows. cheers Slobodan On 10/4/07, Slobodan Blazeski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/4/07

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-04 Thread Slobodan Blazeski
On 10/4/07, Robert L. Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Slobodan, > > I suspect that this Lispworks dependent-bug, since it appears to be in > the serializer, and related to type-dependent information. > > Have you run the test suite? I suspect that seeing which tests fail or > succeed woul

Re: [elephant-devel] add-to-root problem

2007-10-03 Thread Robert L. Read
Dear Slobodan, I suspect that this Lispworks dependent-bug, since it appears to be in the serializer, and related to type-dependent information. Have you run the test suite? I suspect that seeing which tests fail or succeed would give us a good indication. An example from which you can prune