On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:35 PM, John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 6:12 AM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
>
> > elephant reads/writes slots individually, so this means we cannot
> > have more
> > than 1000-1 slots operations per second. that sounds quite
> > prohibitive.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 6:12 AM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
elephant reads/writes slots individually, so this means we cannot
have more
than 1000-1 slots operations per second. that sounds quite
prohibitive.
So with an SQL engine this translates to one SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE per
slot value read o
the solution seems to be trivial: implement caching on a client
side. simple
solution is to cache data within single transaction. complex
solution is to
cache data accross transaction, tracking changes and invalidating
stale
cache entries automatically.
we've implemented both options. so no