My vote is that we stick with 5am - it may be easy to factor our what
we need from arnesi into a separate 5am-util package. There can't be
that many dependencies, it's a rather small amount of code.
Ian
On Jul 29, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Henrik Hjelte wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Lesl
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Leslie P. Polzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How about using lift for testing. It is well supported, and creates nice
>> reports.
>
> I think in the context of Elephant either 5am and Lift would be fine.
>
> All or most tests are in the form that rt expects, wi
> How about using lift for testing. It is well supported, and creates nice
> reports.
I think in the context of Elephant either 5am and Lift would be fine.
All or most tests are in the form that rt expects, with only a thin
layer of 5am adapter above.
How about you hacking Lift support?
Les
