On Feb 20, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
hello
i'm now going to improve transaction handling in db-postmodern.
Great! We should make sure this doesn't change the API, or if it does
to create tracking changes in the BDB and CL-SQL stores.
first of all, i'm going to use "serializa
I'm not sure I understand this part? Do you mean if you have an
internal error which does not complete the intended transaction but
doesn't throw that through the 'with-transaction' statement then you
get bad data?
It seems that you may be expecting too much of the database. If you
are
hello
i'm now going to improve transaction handling in db-postmodern.
first of all, i'm going to use "serializable" isolation level instead of
default "read commited". this means: transaction can fail because of
concurrent slot updates.
with default isolation level concurrent updates were OK, l
