> We don't declare secondary indicies on dup-btrees,
> in case that wasn't clear...
if we did, semantics would be pretty strange, i think..
but what's not clear (perhaps i was not attentive) is if dup-btree in bdb
supports duplicated pairs, or only duplicated keys with different
values. if it
We don't declare secondary indicies on dup-btrees, in case that wasn't clear...
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Alex Mizrahi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:21:02
To:elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
Subject: [elephant-devel] Re: Duplicate va
> Why make the index unique when the btree allows duplicates?
in normal btrees keys are unique.
in btrees-with-duplicates key+value pairs are unique.
that's the idea. for normal btrees we create index on keys only, for dup-btrees
-- index on pairs.
allowing duplicated key+value pairs will total
