2009/1/27 Alex Mizrahi :
> AP> I could redistribute that "core" as open source, and run
> AP> my "script" (i.e. my website) "on top of" that.
>
> If you're using it only in your website, I think you don't even
> need this open source mumbo-jumbo, as Oracle's license
> only restricts _redistributi
AP> I could redistribute that "core" as open source, and run
AP> my "script" (i.e. my website) "on top of" that.
If you're using it only in your website, I think you don't even
need this open source mumbo-jumbo, as Oracle's license
only restricts _redistribution_ but not use, and
redistribution
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Eslick [mailto:esl...@media.mit.edu]
>
> Well, this is advice is just about worth the bandwidth used
> to download it...
Duly noted.
>
> Elephant and Lisp are widely available open source platforms,
> just like Python. If you are running an applic
Well, this is advice is just about worth the bandwidth used to
download it...
Elephant and Lisp are widely available open source platforms, just
like Python. If you are running an application on top of that
platform, such as a networked service, I'm fairly certain you are as
in the clear
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Eslick [mailto:esl...@media.mit.edu]
> Running BDB behind a website doesn't count as a
> 'distribution' that requires disclosure of the website
> source. The cgi discussion is a sub-case of this.
>
> This wouldn't apply to selling website frameworks
Running BDB behind a website doesn't count as a 'distribution' that
requires disclosure of the website source. The cgi discussion is a
sub-case of this.
This wouldn't apply to selling website frameworks or desktop software,
of course.
Of course if you are going to be making money it would
ap> I'm deeply interested in finding out where Oracle states those
ap> "friendly terms" you are referring to. Can you post a pointer?
I meant the next paragraph in the same document:
Do I have to pay for a Berkeley DB license to use it in my Perl or Python
scripts?
No, you may use the Be
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Mizrahi [mailto:killerst...@newmail.ru]
>
> explanation on BDB's site says that if you, say, use Elephant
> rather than BDB directly, and Elephant is open source, that
> is enough to be eligible for a "free" BDB version.
I simply do not see how you
> Is anyone still using the CL-SQL store? Robert and I have discussed
> deprecating it in this or a future release, although SQLite support is
> the only way to use Elephant with a cheap, free, easy to install/
> distribute backend.
I would prefer to ditch CLSQL and SQLite altogether and put
tha
Great! Thanks for sharing this info.
Yarek
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Ian Eslick wrote:
> I found this same discussion several places on the web and both
> Sleepcat and Oracle seem pretty supportive of the more generous
> interpretation, which is nice!
>
> Ian
>
> On Jan 3, 2009, at 6:02 P
I found this same discussion several places on the web and both
Sleepcat and Oracle seem pretty supportive of the more generous
interpretation, which is nice!
Ian
On Jan 3, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> IE> Is anyone still using the CL-SQL store?
>
> the poll says no one, except on
IE> Is anyone still using the CL-SQL store?
the poll says no one, except one vote in "testing" section
IE> release, although SQLite support is the only way to use Elephant with a
IE> cheap, free, easy to install/ distribute backend.
i think a backend using SQLite directly would make a lot of
Is anyone still using the CL-SQL store? Robert and I have discussed
deprecating it in this or a future release, although SQLite support is
the only way to use Elephant with a cheap, free, easy to install/
distribute backend.
RE: BDB locks - you can increase the lock count pretty easily in th
13 matches
Mail list logo
