??>> I think it is pretty clear -- if you do not give your application that
??>> is using BDB in source or binary form to third parties, you're
??>> ok. That is, using it for web site should be ok.
q> This was precisely my understanding, but the text in the elephant
q> documentation threw me
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think it is pretty clear -- if you do not give your application that is
> using BDB in source or binary form to third parties, you're ok.
> That is, using it for web site should be ok.
This was precisely my understanding, but the t
q> This was rather disturbing (to me) so I read the license documentation
q> from the oracle site and it is quite ambiguous about above stated
q> point.
I don't think it is ambigous. License only restricts _redistribution_ (if
you redistribute, you must also release source code), but it doesn'
??>> SLSIA. I create a brand new BDB-backed elephant repository
??>> and it takes up 40MB of disk space. Why?
LPP> Elephant creates some btrees as part of repository initialization.
LPP> What you're seeing is probably a combination of BDB log files (try to
LPP> invoke db_archive with the -
quasi wrote:
> Is Oracle is still using the Sleepycat licence or have they changed it
> ? I was planning to build a website with a berkeley db backend using
> Elephant. Is this not recommended due to licensing issues ? This would
> be a commercial website and I would not want to release the code
